学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

英検準1級のライティングが毎回悪いです。 1回目 内容 3/4 、構成 1/4 、語い 3/4 、文法2/4 2回目 内容 1/4、構成1/4、語い3/4、文法3/4 こんな感じで毎回ライティングの点数が1番低いです。 2回で共通しているのは、構成が... 続きを読む

Will Societies fature? with low birthrites face. Prents: Workforce, Foodshortige, Technological Innovation, Environment problem. I disagree with the idea. I have two reasons to my opinion. to get on important to First of all, it doesn't cause a foodshortage If the number of people increased, Some people who Live ChrA Parthe popularity decreased, it with bat country can't get the food enough. if food. That is Cause food problem. a Crisis in the not cause Płoblem Second of all,. it doesn't cause an environmental problem. These days, many trash is in ocean and on the ground. This kind of problem is Caused by the people decreased, the number of trash will inclined. foo Support In conducian, I think that low birth raten twon't food shortage and an enviroment a Is marraige becoming less important today than it was in the past ?! I agree with the idea. I have two reasons to support my opinion... university. ability of their studying, their much First of all, having children cost much money. It goes saying Therefore, to support their that these days many students parents must pay money. Secord of all, some women wants to live alone. (Vowadays, the number of women is who is working increasing. As a result, they can have enough money to live by themself so they don't think it is necessary to marry. increasing is is becoming less important. In conclusion, I think that their money problem and the number of people who want to be independent the problem that the marraige is

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

並べ替えの問題がわかりません🥲教えてくださいお願いします🙇‍♀️

rmativ nt Each of us carries just over 20,000 genes that encode everything from the keratin in our hair down to the muscle fibers in our toes. It's no great (1) (own / came / where / from / our / mystery / genes): our parents bequeathed them to us. And our parents, in turn, got their s genes from their parents. But where along that genealogical line did each of those 20,000 protein-coding genes get its start? That question has hung over the science of genetics (2) (ago / dawn / century / since / a / ever / its). "It's a basic question of life: how evolution generates 1 novelty," said Diethard Tautz of the Max Planck Institute for 10 Evolutionary Biology in Plön, Germany. New studies are now bringing the answer into focus. Some of our genes are immensely old, perhaps (3) (to / way / back / dating / all the / the) earliest chapters of life on earth. But a surprising number of genes emerged more recently. many in just the past few million years. The youngest evolved after our 15 own species broke off from our cousins, the apes. Scientists (4) (being / finding / into / are / genes / come / new) at an unexpectedly fast clip. And once they evolve, they can quickly take on essential functions. Investigating how new genes (5) (understand / help / become / scientists / important / may / so) the role they may play in diseases like cancer. [1] Read the passage and rearrange the seven words in (1) - (5) in the correct order. Then choose from 1-4 the option that contains the third and fifth words. (1) 13rd: our (2) (3) (4) (5) 5th: genes 3rd: ago 5th: since 3rd: back 5th: the 2 3rd: where 5th: came 2 3rd: its 5th: ever 23rd: the 5th: back 2 3rd: genes 5th: into 1 3rd: genes 5th: being 1 3rd: may 5th: scientists 3 3rd: scientists 5th: understand 3 3rd: genes 5th: from 3 3rd: its 5th: a 3 3rd: way 5th: back 3 3rd: finding 5th: genes 23rd: important 5th: help 43rd: help 3rd: own 5th: came 3rd: came 5th: dawn 43rd: the 5th: the 4 3rd: new 5th: come 5th: understand may may understand thep (早稲田大) wystery. ne TOL Recome Sc

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

画像横になってすみません blow「息を吹きかける」、steaming「湯気の立った」はわかったのですが、間にあるこのacrossってなんですか!? blow acrossで繋がってるのかなーって思ったのですが辞書引いても出てきませんでした😭 よろしくお願いします

3 <英文構造> Somewhere, millions of years ago, just after learn... 同格 e fire, the primitive human was faced with a difficult technological dilemma: how to cool his piping-hot food enough to be コロン以下で dilemma の内容を説明 疑問詞 + to 不定詞 「・・・するのに十分に」 able to eat it. Surely he must have burned his tongue enough times. He would have to find 助動詞 + have done 過去の習慣を表す would a way of eating the hot stuff. Then he must have discovered that by putting his lips together 助動詞 have done discovered の目的語 and blowing across) a steaming bowl of mammoth stew, the food magically cooled). Why? He S hadn't a clue, but it worked. FOCUS 助動詞 PE he must have burned his tongue : 過去の経験や完了の意味を含む助動詞 must + have done 「・・・ したに違いない」 の形→ 「彼(=原 始人)は舌をやけどしたに違いない」。 (→重要構文 31 て考えてす 間 この死行前は何 he must have discovered that ~ the food magically cooled: inc must have discovered の目的語は that 節 (that cooled)。 that を代名詞の「それ」 と訳さないよ うに注意しよう。 that節の主語・述語は the food (magically) cooled 「食べ物が (魔法のように) 冷 めた」。 その前の by putting 〜は「・・・することによって」 を意味する前置詞 by + 動名詞の表現。 buman puc すべき ... enough to be : how to cool は疑問詞 + to 不定詞 「どのように~すべきか〜の l.2 how to cool 仕方」の表現。 「であるほど十分に」 を意味し cool を修飾。 「そ (→ 重要構文 10 enough to be Hold wasob 313860 れを食べられるくらい十分に冷ます」 となる。 → 重要構文 11 ivillization l.3 find a way of eating the hot stuff : 同格を表す of でつながっている→ 「….する方法」と訳す。 RENSE) Vocabulary Check NDOW 訳 どこかで、何百万年も前、火を使うことを覚えた直後、原始人は、ある困難な技術的なジレンマ [板挟み ] に直面していた。 すなわち, ものすごく熱い食べ物を食べることができるくらいに冷ます方法である。 彼 はきっと何回となく舌をやけどしたに違いない。 彼は熱い物を食べる方法を見つけなければならなかった。 そんなとき彼は、 唇をすぼめて湯気の立つマンモスのシチューの入ったお椀に息を吹きかけることで、食べ 物が魔法のように冷めることを発見したに違いない。なぜなのか。 彼にはまったく見当がつかなかったが, その方法はうまくいったのである。 vody tavsundw) snsig 「原始の、原始的な」 ■ primitive □technological 「技術的な」 □ burn MG SRI 文重 「~をやけどする」 Vocabulary Plust ~ in svol orwalqoo1 somewhere 「どこかで」 ■ be faced with 「〜に直面している」 □ put ~ together 「~をあわせる」 「手がかり」 ■ clue

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

チェック入れてる部分の答えと解き方を教えてください!

45 English Logic and Expression I UNIT 4 FACTBOOK GRAMMAR Fill in the blanks and complete the senteces. 1. 100,000 liters of water 100 個のハンバーガーを作るのに 10万リットルの水が必要です。 2. If you use this tool, most of the bacteria Y 2. ). この道具を使えば、ほとんどのバクテリアは除去することができます。 3. ( Was ) this food ) from abroad? この食品は外国から輸入されたのですか。 4. The water problem in this country ( ) yet. この国における水問題はまだ解決されていない。 1. These Tools heres to make 100 hamburgers. Is the tool 3. S 2 Put the words in the correct order to complete the sentences. 1. Thanks to your help, I given / people / these tools / to/ are] in developing countries. みなさんのおかげで、これらの道具は発展途上国の人たちに提供されています。 2. Why [ the Hippo Roller/is / called / the tool ]? なぜその道具はヒッポローラーと呼ばれているのですか。 3. The tool [ made / plastic /is/of]. その道具はプラスチックで作られています。 are Aver To Team exlled the s plastic made of net ) ts Class 1-0 ) _! [割れている] Com Fur Boun - yo 3 Fill in the blanks and complete the conversation. (In their classroom, after the P.E. class.) A: Look! The window B: Before we left the room, we didn't notice that. A: While we were away, something must have happened. B: Anyway, the window soon. [修理しなければならな A: Let's go and tell our homeroom teacher. He was surprised at it. It

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

日本語訳をお願いしたいです!!お願いします

次の英文を読んで、設問に答えなさい。 Everybody wants to eat delicious and safe food. However, exposure to different cultures reveals 2 how people's attitudes towards food safety and taste are not all innate or biological. Assumptions and practices regarding the preparation and presentation of food highlight the influence of culture on what and how people eat. For example, in one culture, some kinds of fresh ingredients might be considered edible (a), that is, without any kind of preparation like washing, peeling or heating. Yet in another culture, the same foodstuff may require some kind of preparation before it can be eaten. It is often difficult for people from the same culture to view such activities and beliefs objectively, and so witnessing the food practices of other cultures can be surprising. Sashimi is a great example of this. While sashimi may be the result of several steps of preparation from cleaning and cutting, to a particular style of presentation - heating is not one of these steps. (2)Japanese consumers take it for granted Cultures, the conventional belief may be that real and fish require some sort of cooking, such as baking or frying, (3) in order (b) them to be considered edible. In these cultures, sashimi is not thought of as raw, delicious and safe to eat, but rather as uncooked, and therefore possibly unsafe to eat, regardless of how it may taste. Fresh chicken eggs are another raw foodstuff commonly eaten in Japan — as a topping for rice, or as a dipping sauce for sukiyaki, for example but most people in the UK or the USA believe that chicken eggs require some kind of heating before they are fit for human consumption. However, the ways in which people from other cultural backgrounds eat certain foods might be considered equally unconventional by many Japanese. For example, few Japanese would eat the skin of apples or grapes. In this case, the difference involved in the preparation of the food is not the use of heat, but the removal of part of the foodstuff. People in much of the world eat apples and grapes without peeling them. A European might think, What could be more healthy and delicious than picking an apple from the tree and eating it?' But this way of thinking is not shared by a large number of Japanese. (4) It is clear that different cultures have different conventions regarding the preparation of particular foods, and different beliefs about what is considered delicious. However, there is no question that some common food preparation practices - or sometimes a lack of certain food preparation processes - are unsafe from a scientific point of view. However delicious they may be, raw meat and fish can contain the eggs of harmful parasites like tapeworms, which are often undetectable. If chicken eggs are not properly stored, and are left unconsumed for a long time, they can easily produce bacteria like salmonella. The poisoning caused by salmonella does not usually require hospitalization, but it can be very dangerous for young children and elderly people. In addition, while eating the skin of apples and grapes may be a good source of dietary fiber, one also runs the risk of consuming insecticides, the poisons that are used to protect many non-organically farmed fruits from insects. So, while there may be 'no accounting for taste' beyond culture, safety is a different issue, and (5) we should always be aware of the risks involved with culturally accepted methods of food production and consumption. 問1 下線部 (1)で,空欄 ( a )に入る最も適切な語句を, (A)~(D)から選び, 記号で答えなさい。 (A) as is clear (B) as is fresh (C) as they are (D) as unclean 問2 問3 問4 問5 下線部(2)を日本語に訳しなさい。 下線部 (3)の空欄(b)に入る語(1語) を書きなさい。 下線部(4) を日本語に訳しなさい。 下線部 (5)の理由として最も適切なものを, (A)~(D) から選び,記号で答えなさい。 (A) Eating raw chicken eggs or unpeeled fruits can be dangerous in certain conditions because of harmful bacteria or pesticides. (B) Eating unpeeled apples or grapes may cause weight gain. (C) Only young children and elderly people are vulnerable to particular bacteria. (D) Beliefs about what is considered delicious actually come from better understanding of food preparation. 問6 本文の内容と一致するものを, (A)~(G)から3つ選び,記号で答えなさい。 (A) By food preparation processes, the author exclusively means the use of heat. (B) Culturally established ways of consuming food may conflict with scientific principles of food safety. (C) In some food cultures outside Japan, fish in its raw state is not categorized as an edible foodstuff. (D) People having little contact with other cultures tend to view their own food-related conventions as natural and standard. (E) Repeated exercise is required for the mastery of any food preparation. (F) Instinct alone determines what and how people eat. (G) All cultures around the world consider it natural to eat unpeeled fruit.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

全文訳お願いします!

4 20 科学 420 words Chapter 1 The recipe for making any creature is written in its DNA. So last year, when 1-1 geneticists* published the near-complete DNA sequence of the long-extinct woolly mammoth, there was much speculation about whether we could bring this giant creature back to life. 5 東京理科大学 Creating a living, breathing creature from a genome* sequence that exists only in a computer's memory is not possible right now. But someone someday is sure to try it, predicts Stephan Schuster, a molecular biologist at Pennsylvania State University and a driving force behind the mammoth genome project. So besides the mammoth, what other extinct beasts might we bring back to life? Well, 12 10 it is only going to be possible with creatures for which we can recover a complete genome Without one, there is no chance. And usually when a creature dies, the (1) - DNA in any flesh left untouched is soon destroyed as it is attacked by sunshine and bacteria. sequence. There are, however, some circumstances in which DNA can be preserved. If your 15 specimen froze to death in an icy wasteland such as Siberia, or died in a dark cave or a really dry region, for instance, then the probability of finding some intact stretches of DNA is much higher. Even in ideal conditions, though, no genetic information is likely to survive more than a million years. - so dinosaurs are out and only much younger remains are likely to yield good-quality DNA. "It's really only worth studying specimens that are less than 100,000 years old," says Schuster. The genomes of several extinct species besides the mammoth are already being sequenced, but turning these into living creatures will not be easy. "It's hard to say that something will never ever be possible," says Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute 25 for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, "but it would require technologies so far removed from what we currently have that I cannot imagine how it would be done." But then (3) 50 years ago, who would have believed we would now be able to read the instructions for making humans, fix inherited diseases, clone mammals and be close to creating artificial life? Assuming that we will develop the necessary technology, we have 30 selected ten extinct creatures that might one day be resurrected. Our choice is based not just on practicality, but also on each animal's "charisma" - just how exciting the prospect of resurrecting these animals is. 1-3

回答募集中 回答数: 0