学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

英文一段落3文目featuring family mealsのfeaturingとはどういう意味でしょうか?? 調べてみたのですが上手く合いそうな訳が出てきませんでした どなたか教えて下さると幸いです。

第4問 次の問い (A.B)に答えよ。 (配点 40) 次の文章はある説明文の一部である。この文章と表を読み, 下の問い(問1~ に入れるのに最も適当なものを、 それぞれ下の0~ A 4)の 33 36 のうちから一つずつ選べ。 Art may reflect the ways people lived. \Researchers have discussed how One study was conducted to art portrays clothing and social settings. determine if this idea could be extended to paintings featuring family meals. The results of this study might help illustrate why certain kinds of foods were painted. (The researchers examined 140 paintings of family meals painted from the years 1500 to 2000. These came from five countries: the United States, France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands. The researchers examined each painting for the presence of 91 foods, with absence coded as 0 and presence coded as 1. For example, when one or more onions appeared in a painting, the researchers coded it as 1. Then they calculated the percentage of the paintings from these countries that included each food. Table 1 shows the percentage of paintings with selected foods. The researchers discussed several findings. First, some paintings from these countries included foods the researchers had expected. Shellfish were most common in the Netherlands' (Dutch) paintings, which was anticipated as nearly half of its border touches the sea. Sécopd, some paintings did not include foods the researchers had expected. Shellfish and fish each appeared in less than 12% of the paintings from the United States, France, and Italy although large portions of these countries border oceans or seas. Chicken, a common food, seldom appeared in the paintings. Thipd, some paintings included foods the researchers had not expected. For example, among German paintings, 20% of them included shellfish although only 6% of the country touches the sea. Also, lemons were most common in paintings from the Netherlands, even though they do not grow there naturally. - 18 - (2610-18)

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

10番と4番の違いが明確に説明出来ないです。 正解はそれぞれ③、④です 10番で③が正解なら4番で①が正解にもなりそうだなと思ってしまいました。 どなたか教えて下さると幸いです

HO円 現住元、 ロロ■ “No, they ( ) to Dallas. 継続を表す。本問は完了·結果を表す用法。 標準 O are just moved 3 have just moved 2 had just moved の ④ will just move have 未来完了(will have done) 9 >未来完了は,未来のある時点を基点にして,それまでの完了 結果, 経験, (状態の)継続を表す。 >本間は next Sunday という未来の時点を基点にして,それまでの「3年 間」にわたる stay という状態の継続を表している。 くセンター試験) )in Kobe for three years. Next Sunday he ( O has stayed ③ will stay 9 ロロロ 2 stays ④ will have stayed CODea og asd e 標準 く東北学院大) S00mio9 ) already. 過去完了 (had done) >過去完了は,過去のある時点を基点にして、それまでの完了·結果, 経験, (状態の)継続を表す。 >本間は when節で示された過去の時点を基点にして, それまでに wedding が start「始まる」という動作が完了したことを表している。 10 10 口ロロ When we arrived at the hotel, the wedding ( D started 2 starts 3 had started ④ has started く芝浦工大) eight years before, 標準 When I went back to the town I ( ロロロ everything was different. Dwas leaving 2 have left 11 大過去-had done nnol inpana siol t 11 >2つの過去の事柄があって, 一方が他方より「前」 であったことを表す場 合、大過去というが, 形は過去完了と同じ had done を用いる。 ③ had left was left 〈大阪大谷大) 上 七

解決済み 回答数: 1