Questionsのところをお願いします。

0に iD qデ に ココ みあ > ンンノンンン Guestions_ ②) シクンクンククシンククシクシシクンクシンジンンククンクシクンルンルンググググ 本文の内容に合う ように, 空所に英語を入れて質問に答えましょう。 本Il in the blanES and answer the questions. 《) What do So@ dogs think when tney are huqgdged? __ Theythinkitis a( ) 9の Do many doO9S enljoy wearind clothin9? ), they ( ーー 【

この2問の答えを教えてください！

4. 水曜日は、 その店が休みの日だ。 Wednesday is the day ( )( ) the shop is closed. 5. その作家は多くの小説を書いているが, 私は 1 國しか読んだことがない。 The author has written a lot of novels, only one ( ( ) | have read.

let's scanのチェックお願いします。 訂正があれば教えてください。

Environment ① No one knows for sure / the exact number of plant and animal species / on the Earth. // ② m fact / we wil never know it / because scientists find more than 15,000 new species / each year. / ⑨ Plants and animals depend on each other /(G-2) to survive.// ④ No single species can exist alone / in nature. // ⑥ They all share the same air。 water,and soil // ⑥ Humans are just one of those species. // 〇② But we often forget that. / “Man is a part of nature,/ and his war against nature /iS inevitably a war against himself" / said Rachel Carson,/ author of S7/ez7 Spr7g.// ⑨ By (G-3) saying so, /she called for a change / in our vieW of the natural world. //

丸は気にしないでください(><) 答え教えていただけると嬉しいです😭

間 JH OUT culture, where the use ot dictionaries 1S WideSDread。many people may have the impression that a word's meaning is simply its dictionary definition.A little thought should show however, that there must be more to meaning than this. It is true that when someone wants to find out what き Word means, an easy and practical way to do it is to look the word up ina dicionary. Most people in our caltare accept dictionaries as providing unauestionably authoritative accounts of the meanings of the words they define. [2] Thenoleof dictionaries/ in our society as authorities on meaning 1eads many people to feel that the dicionary dehnition of a word more accurately represents the word's meaning than does an individual speaker's nderstanding of the word. Keep in mind/ however。 that the people who write dictionaries arrive at their definitions by studying the ways speakers of the language use different words. Some dictionaries are relatively prescriptive\、 others more descriptive* but all must face the fact that a word means what people use it to mean。 There simply is no higher authority than the general community of native speakers of the language. This is obyiously the position one must take in descriptive analysis、 but even in prescriptive grammar, words cannot be given strange defimitions that dont correspond to actual uses of those words by the speech community. A word's meaning is determined by the people who use that word, not by a dictionary- [3] The iqea that a dictionary definition is all there is to a word's meaning runs into even more serious problems when one considers that im order to understand the dictionary definition of a word, one must know the meanings of the words used in that definition: For example. 下 the word ecfo7xere is defined as 'a blastomere that develops into ectoderm'、one must ee he 0 Me 0 Pd Side

2問教えてください😭

[4」 。 Ta word's meammng is its dictionary definition, then understanding this meaning involves understanding the meanings of the words used in the definitions. But understanding the meanings of these words must involve understanding the meanings of the words in 妨e7 definitions. And understanding 7ese definitions must involve understanding the words they use, which of course would have to involvye understanding even more definitions. The process is never-ending. [5] Sometimes the circularity* of a set of dictionary definitions is apparent by looking up just a few words. For instance, one English dictionary defines gzozze as being or having the nature of a deity*、 but defines gez/y as "divinity*. Another defines przde as the quality or state of being proud', but defines proxd as *feeling or showing pride'、Examples hke these are especially graphic\。but essentially the same problem holds for any dictionary-style definition. Dictionaries are written to be of practical aid to people who already speak the language, not to make theoretical claims about the nature of meaning. People can and do learn the meanings of some words through dictionary definitions, so Would be unfair to say that such definitions are completely unable to characterize the meanings of words, but it should be clear that dictionary definitions cant be all there is to the meanings of all the words in a language.

It is～の文は、「Aを50回書くことを頼まれたこと」というニュアンスになっていますか？

【Get the Picture】 (教科書) 1. What is the author grateful for? > 社e hg MRch he wes 0s*ed her he .A jumes

答え教えてください

Mookzemcmwearょうに の Tem benowr PT my rh moee eround the eunr の @ mr sm S Ar sm jet the eerth Ne am 9 @ wwatoher Diyou buy thie beeyeaterdeyr thet bag ーー PT the day betom (0 ぐ Hesaito wm"Plemse dont make noieer @ Re 5 ーー memke noieer rcienoe [回 のEXを郭んで。 あとの各問いに答えよ。 We dlame history, the glory of the past。 more ofeen under fichion than ud ー iri mumt be afnhated with one or the other。 TFnok that ia hmtory ia lowe rewt somewhere in betveen the two main divisiops of the kinds of books then 革 "mually admitted that history ia cfoser to fction than to ecionee This does not mean that a historimn moAes up his factsr hke a poet or story teler However we might get into trouble iTwe insisted too strongly that a writer of fction pkes up んis facts He creates aworid。 But this new world is no totaly diierent fom our own 一 indeed, had better not be 一 and a poetis an ordinary man。 with grdinary senees by and through which he has enrned. He does not see things that We annot see (he may see better or in a shightly different way)。 Hi charactere use wordml that we use (ofherwise we could not behieve in them) 。 It is only in dreams that human beingm create really strange new worids 一 yet even in the most fantastic dream the events and creatures of the imagination are made up out of elements of everyday experience. They are merely put together in strange new ways 人 good historian does not, of course, make up the past. He considers himself responsibly bound by some concept or oriterion of aceuracy or facts. Nevertheless。it is 3mportant to remember that the historian must alvays make up something. 。He reteither fnd a generel pattern in_ or impoee one on events: or he must LE jp kaors why the pereone jn hia story did the things they did。 He may have as genaral theoryorphiosophyr euch as fhat Provadence les human atiare。and make hishistory 硬 hat Orhe may abjure an such pattern imposed as it were from the outside or

答えを教えて欲しいです

Peelowimeand anewerthe easeee rme te kohid ata te slowine | tieem meiwe wl stieie ke pl ay rb 2 henm ada tmd many omewmem os ineemet ses th mr enhne or beer sp onine ake an te ner en walkne Peralwew ut rwpeiiy waol gr eepk wis am woy ux eriaes wipmmlamasvihtw km

power on lllのlesson8の 和訳全部教えて欲しいです。

en 7 05 の Ja72O7 "7 sofd の myse7. ッ 77xf5 のGS 7 gp sehoo/ sedの が60eae ia Ore 0のOr / gn 7e80778 My Pf7204 g7777 gg 。 7eocdon 0 人 7agehers co7177た ckonged 還 Natsumoto NoriO, は nature photographer AKAM -失 aphoto of the northern 還 Matsumoto wanted to take He 。 ghts over the talest 5eak in North America. thought such a photo would bea tribute to Hoshino Aichio。 who was a famous nature photographer but Wa atacked and kiled by a b68rin Russia in 1996。 還 ttook Matsumoto two years to take the photo. He = made three winter camping trips at the foot of Mt. Denaii. During the trips, he spent 64 days waiting for o stay im the e same time。 ong enough : lto take the : ught a Bat 上 : moonh it was weak : aesen team ee reaetion commenr lkemen e。 opinion norther tm5z8yna peak [piki North An fp979 sme tribute attack(e lstekl camp(r 【ksempGn Denat| frame でaptun lmannlait 5 hatEm thstme

37行目の文章で訳が「さて、このプロセスとインターネット上に掲載されるプロセスとを対比してみよう。」なのですが、contrastを他動詞ととると辞書でcontrast toという例文が載っていなくて、contrastを名詞でとると文中に動詞が無くなってしまいます。 このco... 続きを読む

so decide whether the article is worthy of publication. Teedback from these readers often results in significant revisions or changes to the document。 The author might even decide not to proceed with firther yritng or publication i or example。 the document has major flaws or if the research on which it is based is found to be incomplete or faulty. This review procesS is rigorous and it usually ensures that only high-quality acles are 35 published. TE S rare that errors survive the extensive reviews_that-take_place-before an -gFGele appears in print in a scholarly publicaton. Now contrast that process 《9)the process of publishing on the Web. for which here is no review of any sort no quality control in place. As soon as the first draft of the article