学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

英検二級ライティングの要約問題を採点してください! 回答:These days, some university students choose to join short-term. By doing so, they can know about companies ... 続きを読む

以下の英文を読んで、その内容を英語で要約し, 解答欄に記入しなさい。 語数の目安は45語~55語です。 解答は, 解答用紙のB面にある英文要約解答欄に書きなさい。 なお, 解答欄の外 に書かれたものは採点されません。 解答が英文の要約になっていないと判断された場合は, 0点と採点されることが あります。 英文をよく読んでから答えてください。 University students often plan for their future careers by attending job fairs or searching online for information about different kinds of work opportunities. There are other ways, too. Some of them choose to join short-term work programs at companies called internships. These have some good points. Students will be able to know more about companies they are interested in, such as what kind of jobs there are and what kind of people are working there. Also, internships allow students to get to know other students. These students can encourage each other both during and after the internship. On the other hand, if students choose to join very short internships, they may not be able to understand the job they are doing before the internships end. Also, students who take part in internships may find it difficult to do well in their studies.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

121(1)の英文を解釈して頂きたいです。 構文的な表現ですか?教えて下さい。

108 (1) We got off the train. (2) Let's get off this subject. 109 (1) His actions do not always correspond with his words. (2) Roughly speaking, the seasons in England corre- spond with those in Japan. 110 The broad lines on the map correspond to roads. 111 At that store they deal in fish and meat. 112 (1) Zoology and botany deal with the study of life. (2) Make sure that the complaints are dealt with as quickly as possible. 113 (1) We cannot agree with you on this point. (2) This food does not agree with me. 114 (1) I cannot agree to your proposal. (2) He agreed to my plan. 115 They will not consent to your proposal. 116 Many people died of cholera. 117 I couldn't meet him at the station because my car ran out of gas. 118 The car ran short of gas before reaching the city. 119 My income falls short of my expenditure by five hun- dred pounds. 120 He passes for a learned man in our community. 121 (1) Not a day passed by but he repented of what he had done. (2) He passed by my house but didn't drop in. (3) I cannot let the remark pass by in silence. 108 (1) 私たちは列車から降りた。 (2) この話題はよそう。 109 (1) 彼の行動は言葉と必ずしも一致しない。 03 型 動詞+前置詞 (2) おおざっぱに言うと, イングランドの季節は日本のものとほ とんど同じだ。 110 地図上の幅の広い線は道路に相当する。 doro 111 その店では魚と肉を商ってい 112 (1) 動物学と植物学は生命の研究を扱っている。 (2) 苦情はできるだけ迅速に処置されるようはからいなさい。 113 (1) この点では,我々は君に賛成できない。 (2) この食べ物は私の体に合わない。 114 (1) 君の提案には同意できないな。 (2) 彼は私の計画に同意してくれた。 ○115 彼らはあなたの提案に同意しないだろう。 ○ 116 多くの人々がコレラで死んだ。 ○ 117 私の車のガソリンがなくなったので, 彼と駅で会えなかった。 ○ 118 その車は町に着く前にガソリンを切らしてしまった。 ○ 119 私の収入は支出に比べて500ポンド足りない。 ○120 彼は私たちの地域では博学の人で通っている。 121) 彼は自分のしたことを後悔せずに過ごした日は1日もな かった。 (2) 彼は私の家のそばを通ったが立ち寄らなかった。 (3) 私はその言葉を聞き捨てにはできない。 17

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

投げやりです。すいません。英語皆無なので代行してください。

【必答問題 5 日常使う物のデザインをする際には標準化 (standardization) という方法がある。 という内容に続く次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点44) If we examine the history of advances in all technological fields, we see that some improvements come naturally through the technology itself, while others come through standardization. The early history of the automobile is a good example. The first cars were very difficult to operate. They required strength and skill beyond the abilities of many. Some problems were solved through automation. Other aspects of cars and driving were standardized through the long process of international standards committees: . On which side of the road to drive (constant within countries) country, but variable across On which side f the car the driver sits (depends upon which side of the road the car is driven) -The (2) of essential components: steering wheel, brake, clutch, and accelerator (the same, whether on the left- or right-hand side of the car) Standardization is one type of cultural constraint. With standardization, once you have learned to drive one car, you feel confident that you can drive any car, anyplace in the world. Standardization provides a major breakthrough in usability. I have enough friends on national and international standards committees to realize that the process f determining an internationally accepted standard is laborious. Even when all members agree on the merits of standardization, the task of selecting standards becomes a long, political issue. A small company can standardize its products without too much difficulty, but it is much more difficult for an industrial, national, or international body to agree to standards. There even exists a standardized procedure for establishing national and international standards. organizations works on standards. First, a set of national and international Then when a new standard is proposed, it must work its way through each organization's approval process. Standards are usually the result of a *compromise among the various competing positions, which can often be an inferior compromise. Sometimes the answer is to agree on (4 ). Look at the existence I both metric and *English units; of left-hand- and 18 right-hand-drive automobiles. There are several international standards for the *voltages and *frequencies of electricity, and several different kinds of electrical plugs and sockets- which cannot interchanged. With all these difficulties and with the continual advances in technology, are standards really necessary? Yes, they are. Take the everyday, clock. It's standardized. Consider how much trouble you would have telling time with a backward clock, where the hands revolved "counterclockwise." A few such clocks exist, primarily as humorous conversation pieces. When a clock truly violates standards, such as (the one in Figure 1, it is difficult to determine what time is being displayed. Why? The logic behind the time display is identical to that of conventional clocks: there are only two differences - the hands move in the opposite direction (counterclockwise) and the location of "12," usually at the top, has been moved. This clock is just as logical as the standard one. It. bothers us because we have standardized on a different scheme, on the very definition of the term clockwise. Without such standardization, clock reading would be more difficult: you'd always have to figure out the "mapping. E) compromise *metric メートル法の *English units イギリスの計量法(ヤードボンド法) *frequencies of electricity 電気の周波数 voltages E *mapping 対応づけ (2つのものの間の関係を意味する専門用語) 問1 下線部(1)の内容を、 同じ段落の自動車の例に基づいて30字以内の日本語で答えよ。た だし、句読点も字数に数える。 問2 本文中の空所 (2) に入る語として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ 選び 記号で答えよ。 7 color イ location ウ price I sight (239) 問3 第2パラグラフ (Standardization is one type of ...) について 次の Question に対す る Answer となるように、空所に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エのうちから一 つ選び、 記号で答えよ。 Question: What is "a major breakthrough in usability" provided by standardization? Answer Because of standardization, you ( device of the same kind all over the world. 7 can apply what you have learned to イ can make cannot produce I cannot use what you have learned when using 問7 下線部(5)が表す図 (Figure 1)として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選 び記号で答えよ。 11 12 1 12 ) any machine or 10 2 10% 9 3 1 5 6 問4 下線部(3)の示す内容を, 40字程度の日本語で答えよ。 ただし, 句読点も字数に数える。 ウ 11 6 1 問5 次の文を第3パラグラフ (Ihave enough friends...) に入れるとき,本文中の①~ のうちのどの位置に入れるのが最も適当か、 次のア~エのうちから一つ選び, 記号 で答えよ。 9 3 Each step is complex, for if there are three ways of doing something, then there are sure to be strong proponents of each of the three ways, plus people who will argue that it is too early to standardize. 70 問8 最終パラグラフ (With all these difficulties...) の内容をもとに, 次の Question に2 語程度の英語一文で答えよ。 Question: According to the writer, why is the standardization of the everyday clo necessary? イ 2 ウ H O 問6 本文中の空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選び 記号で答えよ。 7 a single standard 1 several different standards ウ the same standard I too few standards <<-20-> <-21->

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

ピンクで囲んだ部分のdestroyingとforcing、makingが何故ingが着いているのか分かりません😿分詞構文でしょうか?

You are preparing a presentation for the school science club, using this article from a scientific website. Reaching a Tipping Point: What to Do About the Problem of Space Junk? For over fifty years, slowly at first, but with increasing intensity, we've been sending objects up into orbit. Most of these items begin life as useful 使節を開始する有用な devices, such as the thousands of satellites that bring us information and give 装置として us our 21st century communication, but even these eventually fall out of use 結仕 使われなくなる or break. These satellites, living or dead, share an increasingly crowded layer, 混雑した層 known as near-earth orbit, with rocket parts, tools, and pieces of metal from objects that have already crashed together and broken into pieces. 粉々になる ?? This garbage poses a threat both (to working" satellites of which there are thousands), and (to the earth itself.) For example, in 2009 a disused Russian 使われなくなった module crashed into an active US satellite) destroying both and forcing the International Space Station to change course to avoid the thousands of broken ためらう pieces. While most junk that falls back to earth burns up in the atmosphere. 大気圏上空で larger chunks can occasionally hit the ground, posing a threat to people and Pieces that do burn up] leave pollutants in the atmosphere, such as Property aluminum particles, which can destroy the ozone layer アルミニウム 粒子 It's clear that removing space junk is vital if we are to maintain and build upon our current satellite network. The problem has been discussed continuously since the 1970s, when Donald Kessler, a senior scientist at NASA 継続的に described a scenario (later known as Kessler syndrome) (where a runaway 制御不能の others more and more likely. While the 2009 incident may be the first large cycle of collisions begins, with each collision creating more debris, making 衝突のサイクル near-earth collision, it is thought that Kessler syndrome has already begun with smaller objects. Since Kessler syndrome was first described, many solutions have been proposed, from using lasers to robotic garbage collectors, but cost has been an obstacle to most. In 2021, a Japan-based company named Astroscale launched ELSA-d (short for "End-of-Life Services by Astroscale Demonstration") to show

解決済み 回答数: 1