学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

英文一段落3文目featuring family mealsのfeaturingとはどういう意味でしょうか?? 調べてみたのですが上手く合いそうな訳が出てきませんでした どなたか教えて下さると幸いです。

第4問 次の問い (A.B)に答えよ。 (配点 40) 次の文章はある説明文の一部である。この文章と表を読み, 下の問い(問1~ に入れるのに最も適当なものを、 それぞれ下の0~ A 4)の 33 36 のうちから一つずつ選べ。 Art may reflect the ways people lived. \Researchers have discussed how One study was conducted to art portrays clothing and social settings. determine if this idea could be extended to paintings featuring family meals. The results of this study might help illustrate why certain kinds of foods were painted. (The researchers examined 140 paintings of family meals painted from the years 1500 to 2000. These came from five countries: the United States, France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands. The researchers examined each painting for the presence of 91 foods, with absence coded as 0 and presence coded as 1. For example, when one or more onions appeared in a painting, the researchers coded it as 1. Then they calculated the percentage of the paintings from these countries that included each food. Table 1 shows the percentage of paintings with selected foods. The researchers discussed several findings. First, some paintings from these countries included foods the researchers had expected. Shellfish were most common in the Netherlands' (Dutch) paintings, which was anticipated as nearly half of its border touches the sea. Sécopd, some paintings did not include foods the researchers had expected. Shellfish and fish each appeared in less than 12% of the paintings from the United States, France, and Italy although large portions of these countries border oceans or seas. Chicken, a common food, seldom appeared in the paintings. Thipd, some paintings included foods the researchers had not expected. For example, among German paintings, 20% of them included shellfish although only 6% of the country touches the sea. Also, lemons were most common in paintings from the Netherlands, even though they do not grow there naturally. - 18 - (2610-18)

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

この長文がどんな話なのか理解できません😥 出来れば段落ごとに要約して頂けると助かります😔 よろしくお願いします!!!!!!!!!🙇🏽‍♀️🙇🏽‍♀️

We are,(to a remarkable degree, the right distance from the right sort of star, one e 5 of ten billion and we wouldn't be here now./ We are also fortunate to orbit where we that is big enough to radiate lots of energy, but not so big as to burn itself out swiftly t 1s a curiosity bf physics that the larger a stor the more rapidly it burns. Had our sun Ocen ten times as massive、it would have evhonsted itself after ten million years instead of do. 1o0 much nearer and evervthing on Farth would have boiled away. Much rarther away and everything would have frozen. の14 m 1978, an astrophysicist named Micheel Hart made some calculations and Concluded that Earth would have been uninhabitable had it been just 1 percent rartner That's not much, and in fact it wasn't enough. percent 10 from or 5.percent closer to the Sun. The figures have since been refined and made a little more generous 5 nearer and I5 percent farther are thought to be more accurate assessments 1oI om zone of habitability - but that is still a narrow belt. To appreciate just how narrow, you have only to look at Venus. Venus 1s only ©10 15 twenty-five million miles closer to the Sun than we are. The Sun's warmth reaches it just two minutes before it touches us. In size and composition, Venus is very like Earth, but the small difference in orbital distance made all the difference to (3)how it turned out. It appears that during the early years of the solar system Venus was only slightly warmer than Earth and probably had oceans. But those few degrees of extra 20 warmth meant that Venus could not hold on to its surface water, with disastrous consequences for its climate. As its water evaporated, the hydrogen atoms escaped into space, and the oxygen atoms combined with carbon to form a dense atmosphere of the greenhouse gas CO2. Venus became stifling. Although people of my age will recall a time when astrononmers hoped that Venus might harbor life beneath its padded 25 clouds, possibly even a kind of tropical vegetation, we now know that it is much too fierce an environment for any kind of life that we can reasonably conceive of. Its surface temperature is a roasting 470 degrees centigrade (roughly 900 degrees Fahrenheit), which is hot enough to melt lead, and the atmospheric pressure at the surface is ninety times that of Earth, or more than any human body could withstand We lack the technology to make suits or even spaceships that would allow us to visit Our knowledge of Venus's surface is based on distant radar imagery and som。 disturbing noise from an unmanned Soviet probe that was dropped hopefully into the

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

この話の内容がいまいち理解できません😔 どなたか詳しく教えて頂けると助かります!!!!!!!!!💧 宜しくお願いします!!!!!!!🙇🏽‍♀️🙇🏽‍♀️

0 The English language is full of words which have changed their meanings 3lightly or even dranmatically over the centuries. Changes of meaning can be of a number of I (of の用法)【nice の意味の変遷) different types. Some words, such as nice, have changed gradually. Emotive words tend 例示1企 今例示2 2(文構造) to change more rapidly by losing some of their force, so that awful, which originally とzthe meant ‘inspiring awe', now means Very bad’ or, in expressions such as awfully good, い 5 simply something like *very. In any case, all connection with ‘awe' has been lost. 2 Some changes of meaning, though, seem to attract more attention than others. (0This is perhaps particularly the case where the people who worry about such things 3 (the case where 】 【文構造】 believe that a distinction is being lost. For example, there is a lot of concern at the moment about the words uninterested and disinterested. In modern English, the positive 10 form interested has two different meanings. The first and older meaning is approximately 今説明 4 las の用法) 'having a personal involvement in', as in otniab neit The second and later, but now much more common, meaning is ‘demonstrating or He is an interested party in the dispute. pd cooig 不説明 1s experiencing curiosity in, enthusiasm for, concern for, as in 和 He is very interested in cricket. (2)It is not a problem that this word has more than one meaning. Confusion never 小理由 seems to occur, largely because the context will normally make it obvious which meaning is intended. In all human languages there are very many words which have more than one meaning- this is a very common and entirely normal (3)state of affairs. Most 20 English speakers, for example, can instantly think of a number of different meanings for the words common and state and affairs which I have just used.

解決済み 回答数: 1