分詞構文でかかれた文を訳す時、〜ながら、〜ときに、〜ので など色々な訳し方がありますがそれらの訳し方を見分けるのは文脈から読み取るしかないですか？

分詞構文を訳する時、主語は、原文に主語が付いている方をそのまま訳しなければいけないのですか？ 主語を書いてない方は訳の時主語を書かない方がいいのでしょうか？

ptep 下線部に注意して, 次の英文を日本語に直しなさい。 (1) Talking to himself, he came into the room. 後は触り言をいいなかいら部屋の (2) Nat heing interested in the lecturep Ibecame

837firstの用法の解説と、選択肢それぞれの品詞の説明お願いします！

Mr. Suzuki recently ()exception to something his colleague saia ① takes 3 took 835 ② taken のwill take plasing 順天堂大 1ってた 836 The price of this suit is ( ) for our budget. 2 too high much の too much high 図図図 1 much too high 3 high too much hss (甲南大) maheny It was twenty years ago when she saw him (). D at first 837 図 2first 3 firstly のfirst-time (中央大) ()Ithought he was shy, but thenI discovered he was just not interested in other people. 838 図図図 の For the first time At first 3 Firstly (4) For a start (甲南女子大) I onan 839 We must go now; ( ) we won't be in time for the concert.文 ① because ② otherwise 3 therefore 4 unless (全沢学院大 840 The bedroom is a bit too small, () the house is satisfactory. 図図図 1 but instead ② but otherwise 発展 ④ unless that (早稲田大 3 now that 835 鈴木さんは最近,同僚の言ったことに腹を立てた。 3 私たちの予算からすると, このスーツの値段はあまりにも高すぎる。 837 彼女が彼と初めて会ったのは20年前のことだった。 8 最初は彼のことを内気だと思ったが. そのあと, 彼が単に他人に無関心だということがわかっに 839 そろそろ出かけなくては。そうしないと私たちはコンサートに間に合いません。 840 寝室が少し狭すぎるが, その他の点でその家は申し分ない。 354

一番初めの文でtheだけで制約を受けるという意味を表すのですか？

次の英文の下線部を訳しなさい We are creatures of the visible and the perceivable. If somethin. cannot be seen or felt, we imagine it does not exist. We feol for the physically disabled, because we can see his twisted limb but we are indifferent to the emotionally troubled, because their troubles are buried inside their head. (京都産業大

She has tried whatever it takes to teach her son English. 私の解答：彼女は息子に英語を教えるために必要なことは何でもやってきた。 模範解答：彼女は息子に英語を教えるために何でもやってきた。 これって私の解答はどう... 続きを読む

a young manという言葉が、和訳問題でできたのですが、解答は「若者」でした。自分は若い男性と訳したのですか、男性に限定するような訳は減点されますか？ 補足ですが、文脈的には性別は関係ない内容で、逆に男性に限定すると違和感もある内容でした。

この日本語訳で合っていますか？確認お願いします

2. Having a car, I had awide range of activities. をもっていうので、糸仕幅会い治動ができる。

英語　和訳問題　一文 写真の文章の和訳を教えていただきたいです よろしくお願いします

Sometimes, too, students become too narrowly focused on English, without developing other interests, like art or music or business. 〈和訳課題2〉

英語　和訳問題　一文 写真の文章の和訳を教えていただきたいです。 よろしくお願いします

Studying English is a multi-year marathon in which students can give up anywhere along the way and never get back in the race.

私はいまニュージーランドに留学している今年度上智大学を受験予定の高校2年生です。上智大学の経営学科の帰国生入試には和訳問題があるのですが、どれも自分には難しく、現地の先生にアドバイスしていただいてもいまいちわかりません。どなたか、回答を教えていただければと思います。 下線... 続きを読む

Why - and why now? Because of the shift in the Experience Economy. Goods and services are no longer enough; what consumer want today are experience - memorable events that engage them in an inherently personal way. As paid-for experiences proliferate, people now decide where and when to spend their money and time - the currency of experiences - as much if not more than they deliberate on what and how to buy (the purview of goods and services). (1) But in a world increasingly filled with deliberately and sensationally staged experiences - an increasingly unreal world - consumers choose to buy or not buy based on how real they perceive an offering to be. Business today, therefore, is all about being real. Original. Genuine. Sincere. Authentic. In any industry where experiences come to the fore, issues of authenticity follow closely behind. Think of Disneyland. No place before or since its opening in 1955 has provoked more debate on authenticity within modern culture, nor has any other business sparked more controversy on the effect of commercial activity on the reality of modern living than the Walt Disney Company. (2) Or think coffee. Starbucks earns several dollars for every cup of coffee, over and above the few cents the beans are worth, precisely because it has learned to stage a distinctive coffee-drinking experience centered on the ambience of each place and the theatre of making each cup. Perhaps no other company in the world more earnestly and steadfastly seeks to render authenticity ー resolutely shaping how real consumers perceive it to be. The task has become harder and harder, however, as Starbucks has grown from one shop in Seattle to over 13,000 venues around the world, for nothing kills authenticity like ubiquity. The success of Starbucks no longer depends on its operational prowess or taste superiority; it lies solely in sustaining coffee drinkers' perception of the Starbucks experience as authentic. (3) Now that the Experience Economy has reached full flower - supplanting the Service Economy as it had in turn overtaken the Industrial Economy, which itself had replace the Agrarian Economy - such issues of authenticity now bear down on not only all experience offerings but across all of the economyY.