学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

空欄の所が全然分からないです また、埋まっているところもあっているか確認してもらいたいです🙇🏻‍♀️՞ 出来れば明日の朝までにお願いします

<確認しよう> Lesson 2: Let's Have a Healthy Workout *意味が区切れる箇所で「/」 を入れ、文が終わる箇所では、「/」 を入れています。 1 の英文 a wide range of people (range: 範囲、 領域、 幅 幅広い層の人々 3 の英文 Some of them の them は何を指す? many people S V 1 DIn Japan / strength training was not so popular before, but now it is enjoyed / C 5 4 の英文 why はもちろん何? 関係副詞 S by a wide range of people. // ②Many people have begun training their muscles / for health and 0 beauty.// ③Some of them are posting photos and videos of their training / on social media.// 0 2 ④A reason why strength training has become popularis/ that its medical benefits have S ✓ これは文法で何と呼ばれますか。 Without muscles を書き換えると ★日本語訳をきちんとノートに書いておこう! 8 の英文 play はどういう意味? (ヒント:play a role ) この質問に対する答えを3つ挙げてください。 10 の英文 Without muscles, you could not walk/ or even stand. S become clear. ⑤ Since the 1990s, / research on muscles has revealed/ that moderate strength S V S training promotes health// ⑥After the age of 30, / people's muscles become 3 to 8 percent S 14 の英文 S S smaller / every decade.// ⑦Strength training can address this problem.// c 3 ⑧What role do muscles play / in your body? // ⑨First,/ muscles move your body. // ⑩0 munches play 0 S V 0 Moreover, / muscles move your S V Without muscles/ you could not walk / or even stand. // S V② heart and stomach/ without your conscious control // In addition,/ muscles help to create 0 S V.00 heat/ and maintain body temperature. // About 60 percent of the heat // your body produces ②⑥用法 ✓副用法 / comes from muscles. V Be careful not to exercise too much. 下線部を訳せる?→ノートに書いておこうか 運動しないこと V 0 15 の英文 It is said that 節 訳せる? 17 の英文 分詞構文と捉えていいかもしれません。 When doing strength training, When when と doing の間に何が省略されていますか。 doing_ →仮主語 both A and B の意味は AとBの両方 4 14 Be careful not to exercise too much.// 15it is said that too much exercise will weaken vCe 専門的 research h muscles your immune system. doing strength training, S ⑩6 You may easily catch a cold/ just after hard training. /// When S about you need to consider / both the quantity and the quality of your ~について ~に関して onのほうがaboutよりも専門的 B. 用法 分詞構文はその表す意味があいまいなことが多いので、はっきりさせるために分詞の 前に接続詞をつけることがあります。 接続詞 exercise.//

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

写真の黄色い線の部分の文構造を教えていただきたいです🙇 また、 ①ifは「ーかどうか」で訳していいのか ②thisは何を指しているか ③itは何を指しているか も教えていただきたいです。 よろしくお願いします💦

Phil Hello. This is 6 Minute English from BBC Learning English. I'm Phil. Beth And I'm Beth. Phil So, Beth, we're talking about the best education systems in the world today. You went to school here in Britain. What do you think of the British education system? Do you think it could be the best? Beth I think that it's quite good, there's probably a couple of things that I personally would change about it, but I would say it's quite good, but maybe not the best in the world. Phil Well, in this programme, we're going to be talking about the Pisa rankings. Beth The rankings are based on tests carried out by the OECD, that's an international organisation, every three years. The tests attempt to show which countries are the most effective at teaching maths, science and reading. But is that really possible to measure? Well, here is former BBC education correspondent Sean Coughlan talking to BBC World Service programme 'The Global Story'. Sean Coughlan When they were introduced first of all, that was a very contentious idea, because people said 'how can you possibly compare big countries... how can you compare America to Luxembourg or to, you know, or to parts of China, or whatever?' Phil Sean said that the tests were contentious. If something is contentious, then it is something that people might argue about it's controversial. So, at first, Pisa tests were contentious because not everyone believed it was fair to compare very different countries. Beth Phil, I've got a question for you about them. So, in 2022, Singapore was top of the reading rankings. But which of these countries came second? Was it: a) The USA? b) Ireland? or, c) The UK? Phil I think it might be b) Ireland. Beth OK. Well, we will find out if that's correct at the end of the programme. A common pattern in the Pisa rankings is that the most successful countries tend to be smaller. Talking to BBC World Service programme 'The Global Story', Sean Coughlan tells us that many large countries from Western Europe don't score that highly in the rankings. Sean Coughlan They're being outpaced and outperformed by these fast, upcoming countries - you know, Singapore, or Estonia, or Taiwan, or those sort of places which we don't historically think of as being economic rivals, but I suppose the argument for Pisa tests is, if you want to have a knowledge economy, an economy based on skills, this is how you measure it. Phil We heard that many large European countries are being outpaced by smaller nations. If someone outpaces you, they are going faster than you - at a higher pace.

未解決 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

投げやりです。すいません。英語皆無なので代行してください。

【必答問題 5 日常使う物のデザインをする際には標準化 (standardization) という方法がある。 という内容に続く次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点44) If we examine the history of advances in all technological fields, we see that some improvements come naturally through the technology itself, while others come through standardization. The early history of the automobile is a good example. The first cars were very difficult to operate. They required strength and skill beyond the abilities of many. Some problems were solved through automation. Other aspects of cars and driving were standardized through the long process of international standards committees: . On which side of the road to drive (constant within countries) country, but variable across On which side f the car the driver sits (depends upon which side of the road the car is driven) -The (2) of essential components: steering wheel, brake, clutch, and accelerator (the same, whether on the left- or right-hand side of the car) Standardization is one type of cultural constraint. With standardization, once you have learned to drive one car, you feel confident that you can drive any car, anyplace in the world. Standardization provides a major breakthrough in usability. I have enough friends on national and international standards committees to realize that the process f determining an internationally accepted standard is laborious. Even when all members agree on the merits of standardization, the task of selecting standards becomes a long, political issue. A small company can standardize its products without too much difficulty, but it is much more difficult for an industrial, national, or international body to agree to standards. There even exists a standardized procedure for establishing national and international standards. organizations works on standards. First, a set of national and international Then when a new standard is proposed, it must work its way through each organization's approval process. Standards are usually the result of a *compromise among the various competing positions, which can often be an inferior compromise. Sometimes the answer is to agree on (4 ). Look at the existence I both metric and *English units; of left-hand- and 18 right-hand-drive automobiles. There are several international standards for the *voltages and *frequencies of electricity, and several different kinds of electrical plugs and sockets- which cannot interchanged. With all these difficulties and with the continual advances in technology, are standards really necessary? Yes, they are. Take the everyday, clock. It's standardized. Consider how much trouble you would have telling time with a backward clock, where the hands revolved "counterclockwise." A few such clocks exist, primarily as humorous conversation pieces. When a clock truly violates standards, such as (the one in Figure 1, it is difficult to determine what time is being displayed. Why? The logic behind the time display is identical to that of conventional clocks: there are only two differences - the hands move in the opposite direction (counterclockwise) and the location of "12," usually at the top, has been moved. This clock is just as logical as the standard one. It. bothers us because we have standardized on a different scheme, on the very definition of the term clockwise. Without such standardization, clock reading would be more difficult: you'd always have to figure out the "mapping. E) compromise *metric メートル法の *English units イギリスの計量法(ヤードボンド法) *frequencies of electricity 電気の周波数 voltages E *mapping 対応づけ (2つのものの間の関係を意味する専門用語) 問1 下線部(1)の内容を、 同じ段落の自動車の例に基づいて30字以内の日本語で答えよ。た だし、句読点も字数に数える。 問2 本文中の空所 (2) に入る語として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ 選び 記号で答えよ。 7 color イ location ウ price I sight (239) 問3 第2パラグラフ (Standardization is one type of ...) について 次の Question に対す る Answer となるように、空所に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エのうちから一 つ選び、 記号で答えよ。 Question: What is "a major breakthrough in usability" provided by standardization? Answer Because of standardization, you ( device of the same kind all over the world. 7 can apply what you have learned to イ can make cannot produce I cannot use what you have learned when using 問7 下線部(5)が表す図 (Figure 1)として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選 び記号で答えよ。 11 12 1 12 ) any machine or 10 2 10% 9 3 1 5 6 問4 下線部(3)の示す内容を, 40字程度の日本語で答えよ。 ただし, 句読点も字数に数える。 ウ 11 6 1 問5 次の文を第3パラグラフ (Ihave enough friends...) に入れるとき,本文中の①~ のうちのどの位置に入れるのが最も適当か、 次のア~エのうちから一つ選び, 記号 で答えよ。 9 3 Each step is complex, for if there are three ways of doing something, then there are sure to be strong proponents of each of the three ways, plus people who will argue that it is too early to standardize. 70 問8 最終パラグラフ (With all these difficulties...) の内容をもとに, 次の Question に2 語程度の英語一文で答えよ。 Question: According to the writer, why is the standardization of the everyday clo necessary? イ 2 ウ H O 問6 本文中の空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選び 記号で答えよ。 7 a single standard 1 several different standards ウ the same standard I too few standards <<-20-> <-21->

回答募集中 回答数: 0
1/71