学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

まるがついている部分でなぜ同じ過去に実現しなかったことへの願望なのにhadとhaveで使うのが違うんですか?

3 1. If I were to find a new star, I would be able to name it. 2. Without the medicine, my disease couldn't have been cured. 3. I don't have enough money. I wish the shirt were [was] cheaper. 4. They would visit the temple if they had more time. 5. A microwave oven could save us a lot of time. 6. We wish we hadn't agreed to the plan. 解説 1. 「仮に新しい星を見つけたら, 名付けることができ るだろうに。」 仮の話の前提は仮定法過去 〈If S' were to + 動詞の原形, S would + 動詞の原形〉で述べる。 2. 「もしその薬がなければ、 私の病気は治らなかっただろう。」 過去の事実と違う仮定なので仮定法過去完了。 3. 「十分なお金がない。 そのシャツが安ければいいのに。」実現 が困難な願望は仮定法過去 〈S wish S' + 過去形〉。 be 動 は were になるが, S' が1人称 3人称単数の場合. was を使うこともある。 4. 「もっと時間があれば、 彼らはそのお寺を訪れるだろうに。」 現在の事実と違うことは, 仮定法過去 < If S' + 過去形, S would + 動詞の原形) で述べる。 5. 「電子レンジがあれば多くの時間を省けるのに。」 現在の事実 に反する仮定なので, 仮定法過去で述べる。 if節の代わり 主語が仮定の意味を表す。 '6. 「私たちがその計画に賛成していなかったらなあ。」 過去に実 現しなかったことへの願望は (S wish S' had + 過去分詞〉。 4 Description 1. He (wishes) he (had) a computer. 2. She wishes she (could) (have) seen the fireworks last night. 3. She (would [could]) (go [travel]) to Hawaii if she were free now. 解説 1.「コンピューターを持っていればなあと彼は思ってい る。」 実現が困難な願望は仮定法過去 <S wish S' + 過去 2.「花火を見られたらよかったのにと彼女は思ってい 過去に実現しなかったことへの願望を <S wish S' could have + 過去分詞) で表す。 3. 「彼女が今暇なら、彼女はハワイに行く [旅行に行く] だろう に。」 現在の事実と違うことは仮定法過去 <IfS' + 過去形 S would + 動詞の原形〉 で述べる。

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

写真の黄色い線の部分の文構造を教えていただきたいです🙇 また、 ①ifは「ーかどうか」で訳していいのか ②thisは何を指しているか ③itは何を指しているか も教えていただきたいです。 よろしくお願いします💦

Phil Hello. This is 6 Minute English from BBC Learning English. I'm Phil. Beth And I'm Beth. Phil So, Beth, we're talking about the best education systems in the world today. You went to school here in Britain. What do you think of the British education system? Do you think it could be the best? Beth I think that it's quite good, there's probably a couple of things that I personally would change about it, but I would say it's quite good, but maybe not the best in the world. Phil Well, in this programme, we're going to be talking about the Pisa rankings. Beth The rankings are based on tests carried out by the OECD, that's an international organisation, every three years. The tests attempt to show which countries are the most effective at teaching maths, science and reading. But is that really possible to measure? Well, here is former BBC education correspondent Sean Coughlan talking to BBC World Service programme 'The Global Story'. Sean Coughlan When they were introduced first of all, that was a very contentious idea, because people said 'how can you possibly compare big countries... how can you compare America to Luxembourg or to, you know, or to parts of China, or whatever?' Phil Sean said that the tests were contentious. If something is contentious, then it is something that people might argue about it's controversial. So, at first, Pisa tests were contentious because not everyone believed it was fair to compare very different countries. Beth Phil, I've got a question for you about them. So, in 2022, Singapore was top of the reading rankings. But which of these countries came second? Was it: a) The USA? b) Ireland? or, c) The UK? Phil I think it might be b) Ireland. Beth OK. Well, we will find out if that's correct at the end of the programme. A common pattern in the Pisa rankings is that the most successful countries tend to be smaller. Talking to BBC World Service programme 'The Global Story', Sean Coughlan tells us that many large countries from Western Europe don't score that highly in the rankings. Sean Coughlan They're being outpaced and outperformed by these fast, upcoming countries - you know, Singapore, or Estonia, or Taiwan, or those sort of places which we don't historically think of as being economic rivals, but I suppose the argument for Pisa tests is, if you want to have a knowledge economy, an economy based on skills, this is how you measure it. Phil We heard that many large European countries are being outpaced by smaller nations. If someone outpaces you, they are going faster than you - at a higher pace.

未解決 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

なぜ、suggesting になるのかがわかりません💦

英語 About seven years ago I started learning how to paint as a hobby: I was pretty terrible. Everything looked flat, I did not have the right proportions, and my colors were totally off. My friends and colleagues suggested that I stop wasting my time (a ) something I wasn't good at. "Focus on your day job," they said. I kept at it practicing, taking classes, finding the right teachers who could teach and challenge me Over five years, painting started to become intuitive", and surprisingly, I am now considered "good." Today, the same friends say I was born with this talent. "You're in the wrong profession," one said recently. The same thing happened when I started piano and singing lessons a couple of years ago. Comments shifted from. "Stop wasting your time and focus on what you know," to "You've got a musical talent." (A These comments originate from long-held beliefs that growth is largely not possible for adults. Even when there is evidence of learning, it can be caused by talent from birth, like the comments that I received suggested. Most scientific studies on adulthood focus on cognitive maintenance or decline, rather than growth. (b) that even scientists may think that development is severely limited in adulthood. The prevailing" mentality is represented by proverbs, such as "use it or lose it," or worse, "old dogs can't learn new tricks." A few recent studies, such as ones by Arne May and Denise Park, ( C ) suggest that learning new skills, such as juggling or photography, for even three months may strengthen brain functioning in adults. (B) I would take these studies one step further to argue that an important cause of cognitive

解決済み 回答数: 1