学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

(24)の答えがなぜ1になるか分からないです…

(24) The Tale of Mejk Swenekafew Recently, many people have been talking about "fake news" news reports that are untrue. However, such reports have been around for a long time. They are sometimes used in order to get more people to read newspapers, watch TV programs, or visit online news sites. People also use fake news to spread their political or religious beliefs. However, ( 24 ) publishing fake news. In 1903 in the city of Clarksburg, West Virginia, fake news was used to check/if newspaper was really writing its own articles. In the city, there were two rival newspapers, the Clarksburg Daily Telegram and the Clarksburg Daily News. The Daily Telegram's staff believed that the Daily News's reporters were ( 25 ). The Daily Telegram decided to check whether this was happening. It published a fake news story about a man who had been shot after an argument about a dog. The man's name was Mejk Swenekafew. Soon afterward, exactly the same news appeared in the Daily News. However, the reporters at the Daily News had not noticed that the name "Swenekafew" was actually "we fake news" written backward. They were forced to admit that they had copied the Daily Telegram's article. These days, there is more pressure than ever on newspapers, news programs, and news websites to get more readers, viewers, and visitors. In order to do so, they need to report big news stories as quickly as possible. ( 26 ), they are constantly watching each other to make sure they have the latest stories. However, they need to be careful not to do the same thing that the Clarksburg Daily News did. these are not the only reasons for many popular websites have been there are rules to stop people from some TV companies began by a

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

解答を教えてください🙇

LESSON 9 Quome: Bryor 1 Choose the best answer to fill in the blanks. (1) (1) When I was a would (2) You've got ( 1 a few eggs child, I ( 2 should ) on your tie. 2 an egg ) often play baseball with my friends. 4 might 3 must (3) He has such a soft voice that I can ( hardly ℗ hard (4) She cannot speak English, ( nor better 2 nor less (5) The crowd watched the firefighter ( climbing 2 climbed (7) His arguments forced them ( 1 admit to admit Did you have fried eggs for breakfast? dime 3some egg 4 some eggs (9) His English essay was ( ). 1 superior than Carl's 3 superior to Carl's (11) He told me that he ( 1 had never been was never (12) Willy was surprised ( hear (13) The foreigner was used ( 1 handle ) hear him. 3 already ) French. (6) Let's stay home and watch a movie (Y) it's sunny tomorrow. 1 although as soon as 3 even if 4 when 2 to be heard 3 much better 2 handling 1) the ladder. 3 to climb ) he was right. 3 admitted (10) We then moved to Paris, () we lived for six years. 3 where 1 that 2 which ) to America before. ) the news. 4 admitting (8) It is not that I dislike my new job (___) that the working hours are too long. 1 so 2 with 3 for but (神戸学院 4 yet superior for Carl's 4 superior as Carl's 4 to have climbed much less 2 never comes 4 will never come 3 by hearing ) a pair of chopsticks. 3 to handle FERONE 4 what (センター 4 to hear (黒 to handling 2 (1 (2 (創 (名塩 RETESAHONE ( (学) (北海道 GR

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

答えがあっているかわかりません。あってますか??

Exercises Grammar 日本語と同じ意味になるように,( )内の語(句) を並べかえて文を言いましょう。 1. スコットランドはグレートプリテン島の北部にあるのですが、たくさんの観光名所があります。 Scotland (of Great Britain / is / which / in the north), has a lot of tourist attractions. 2. 私はキルトを着た男性が通りを横切っているのを見ました。 2 I (ina kilt / the street / crossing /aman/saw). 3. 私の娘たちはネッシーの存在を信じているようです。 1 My daughters (believe in / to / seem) the existence of Nessie. attraction(s) [træk∫n(z)] 人を引きつける場所 cross (ing) [kró:s(in)] 横切る existence ligzistans] 存在すること Nessie [nési] ネッシー | Key Expressions 日本語と同じ意味になるように, ( ( )内に適切な語を入れて文を言いましょう。 1. 日本とスコットランドには共通点があります。 Japan and Scotland (ave) something (in) ( 2. その当時、私はスコットランドに住んでいました。 (A+) (that) (time), In was living in Scotland. 3. その工場で,だぶだぶのキルトに火がつきました。 The baggy kilt(Cach) (fre) in the factory. 4. 彼女は私にマーマレードのケーキを大きく切り分けてくれました。 She (Cat) (off) a big piece of marmalade cake for me. Express Yourself! 一例を参考にして, あなた自身について発表しましょう。 I saw my English teachers playing tennis yesterday. I saw _yesterday. Hints! ●my neighbors/your sister / a dog ●having an argument / dancing on the school stage/running after your cat 議論

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0