49行目についてなのですがhealthy enoughを十分健康と捉えてしまったのですが和訳がほどほどに健康となっていました。なぜそのように捉えたのか分からないので教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

45 distribution was valid; all the rest had to be thrown ou the IQ scores now fall into a bell curve mainly because that is where the original English and American *psychometricians thought they should fall. But suppose they'd started out with different preconceptions. Suppose they believed that "intelligence" was something like "health": some people were weak and some were strong, but most people were "healthy enough." Their bodies may have been shaped differently, but one 50 type couldn't be called healthier than another. In that case, the distribution of IQ scores would have been very different.

以前画像3枚目の様に修飾限定予告のthatというものを習ったので今回もその形なのかと思い、それらのと入れずに訳してしまったのですがこのthoseの識別は文脈判断ということでしょうか？ 教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

実理 K The starting point for today's *meritocracy, of course, is the idea that intelligence exists and can be measured, like weight or strength or fluency in French. The most obvious difference between intelligence and these other traits is that all the others are presumably changeable. If someone weighs too much, he can go on a その人 →Heyで受けるのが一般的 5 diet; if he's weak, he can lift weights; if he wants to learn French, he can take a course. But in principle he can't change his intelligence. There is another important difference 原則として MV between intelligence and other traits. Height and weight and speed and strength and サフィス体例 関係性が強い文がくる even conversational fluency are real things; there's no doubt about what's being 間違いなん measured. Intelligence is a much murkier concept. Some people are generally (2) m2 Vogue 10 smarter than others, and some are obviously talented in specific ways; they're chess 天才 S masters, math *prodigies. But can the factors that make one person seem quicker than another be measured precisely, like height and weight? Can we confidently say that one person is 10 percent smarter than another, in the same way we can say he's 10 へんて、いつだっ S percent faster in the hundred-yard dash? And can we be confident that two thirds of 櫂へん 言いかえ 15 all people have IQs within one standard deviation of the norm that is, between 90 ように and 110 - - as we can be sure that two thirds of all people have heights within one standard deviation of the norm for height? Yes, they can, and yes, we can. besure least, are the answers that the IQ part of the meritocracy rests on. Those, at (3)-

黄色マーカーの部分の文構造を解説していただきたいです。

intelligence that AI just doesn't get. Social and emotional intelligences, for 接する example-our understanding of different environments, how that influences our example our understanding 観察する feelings, and the way we observe and interact with other people based on how we believe they're feeling. So, a lot of it is about context. Our brains are in V ✓

このtoはなんですか？

確実に and more reliably than humans can. But there are other elements to human intelligence that AI just doesn't get. Social and emotional intelligences, for example our understanding of different environments, how that influences our

この一文の文構造を解説してほしいです

Well, I see human intelligence as being a combination of different elements that are woven together. Al is very good £these elements like math and pattern recognition.

promisingの具体的な内容が下のオレンジの部分となっているのですが、上の緑の部分がだめな理由をどなたか教えてください。

20 15 Rothblatt believes that within twenty years, "mind clones*" will be humanity's biggest invention. (2) The concept of cloning human brains and placing them inside robotic bodies has been described in numerous science fiction works. However, Google director Ray Kurzweil believes that our bodies may be replaced by machines 第2段落 P P C ロスプラットは「頭脳 クローン」が人類最大 の発明になると信じて いる。 グーグル社の 人々の身体はやがて様 重役カーツワイルも、 械に置き換わり、デジ タル的に不死身となる。 人間が現れると信じて いる。 彼は著書の中 で、超知的な「トラン スヒューマン」が様々 な問題を解決すると同 時に、通常の人間をご within ninety years and that some people will become digitally immortal*. His 1999 book The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence describes one possible future in which the boundaries between biological human intelligence and digital artificial intelligence blur*. Kurzweil mentions a possible 流の市民だと見なす future that seems both (3) promising and terrifying. If super intelligent transhumans* become hundreds of times smarter, many problems such as hunger, war, and pollution 【前途有望な未来像】 could be solved. However, (4)there is no guarantee that such computer-based 【恐ろしい未来像①】 ↑ intelligence would act “fairly” by ordinary human standards. According to Kurzweil, during the late 21st century humans who become part of super-intelligent AIsystems* 【恐ろしい未来像②】 来像を描いている。 might start to regard ordinary humans as second-class citizens. At some point, 25 ordinary people simply will not be able to keep up with the super-intelligent 【恐ろしい未来像③】 ↑ "transhumans." If you had the choice and could afford it, would you upload your own consciousness onto a computer? Would you like to purchase a robotic version brofis of yourself?

英作文の添削をお願いします🙇‍♀️ もっといい表現や言い回しがあったら知りたいです。

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes available, more and more companies will probably try to cut their operating costs by using machines instead of human workers whenever possible. Give your opinion of the influence of Al in our lives and communities in coming years. Write an essay of about 120 words in English.

どなたか英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🙇‍♀️ 問）AI（artificial intelligence「人工知能」）は将来、人間の仕事を代わりにするようになるだろうか。100語程度で考えを述べなさい。 解答）I believe that many jobs will... 続きを読む

線を引いたところの訳し方を丁寧に教えて頂きたいです🙇‍♀️

L American poet Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, "Every artist was first an amateur." He likely never thought those words would apply to machines. Yet artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated a growing talent for creativity, whether writing a heavy-metal rock album or producing an original portrait that is strikingly similar to a Rembrandt. Applying AI to the art world might seem unoriginal; there are, of course, plenty of humans delivering awe-inspiring work. Supporters say, however, the real beauty of training AI to be creative does not lie in the end product-but rather in the technology's potential to expand on its own machine-learning education, and to solve problems by thinking in different ways far faster and better than humans can. For example, creative problem-solving AI could someday make snap decisions that save the lives of the passengers in a self-driving car if its sensors fail. AI with a creative component will be essential in developing highly automated systems that can respond appropriately to human life, says Mark Riedl, an associate professor at Georgia Institute of Technology's School of Interactive Computing. "The fact is, we do lots of little bits of creativity every single day; lots of problem-solving goes on," Riedl says. "If my son gets a toy stuck under the couch, I have to devise a tool from a hanger to get it out." Riedl points out human creativity is also important in human social interactions, even telling a well-timed joke or recognizing a pun. Computers struggle with such subtleties. An incomplete understanding of how humans construct metaphors, for example, was all it took for an experiment in Al-generated literature to compose a new Harry Potter chapter filled with nonsensical sentences such as, "The floor of the castle seemed like a large pile

ここでの one has はどのような働きでどのような意味を持ちますか？

with respect to intelligence. Moreover, in measuring intelligence one has, of course, to take into account the effects of education (4) and cultural background. T 10 lesly of famous people have also