一番最後の段落のinはなんの役割ですか？ その後のwhat が関係代名詞でその前のwhich の関係副詞節なのは分かっていても役が作れません。

6 Perkin and his fellow chemists received great riches (from these chemical VI 01 color discoveries), but couldn't overcome the British scientific leaders' dislike V2 4 O2) <for the commercial>. (By the time Perkin died (in 1907)), the British dye S industry had been overtaken (by Germany]), <which attracted the world's best chemists (to its factories) (in what Garfield calls "one of the first classic examples <of brain drain>.")> 0" S"

不定詞の問題です。合っているか確認お願いします🙇

(1)このダイヤの指輪は高すぎて私には買えません. (不定詞を用いて> This diamond ring (2) このあたりで子どもを遊ばせてはいけません。 危険です。 (3)順番を待っている間、 自分の心臓がドキドキするのを感じた。 While waiting for my turn, (4)その老人は,暗くなったら外出しないよう私たちに警告した。 The old man (5) 彼は非常に重要な情報を手に入れたものと思われます。 He HINTS around here. It's dangerous. after dark. of great importance. (1) 「私には」と不定詞の意味上の主語を示す。 2 0 をさせておく」は〈let+0+原形 不定詞> (3) 「ドキドキする」 beat rapidly (4) 「~に警告する」 warn (5) 「思われる」 be thought. 「~を手に入れる」 obtain 17

that is engaged というのはどのような役割をしているのですか？🙇🏻‍♀️

3 The father's reaction to his three silly boys might be expected, she S S says, (because "when you're texting or answering e-mail), the part of your brain [that is engaged] is the 'to do' part, [where there's also a sense of urgency to get the task accomplished, a sense of time 同格 pressure.3行目 the は強調のため 「ジ」と音声では読まれています。 和訳 3人の分別がない少年に対する父親の反応は予想されるものかもしれない。と いうのも「携帯メールを送ったり返信したりするときに、それに関係している脳 の部分は "to do" という部分であり、そこでは、課題を完了させなければという 緊急性の感覚、つまり時間のプレッシャーという感覚もあるからです。 1515) engage 「関係する」 accomplish 「完了させる」

英文解釈の問題で、 写真の英文にavoc と（副詞）、［形容詞］がふられて いるんですが、 later in life の箇所には何もふられていません。 この場合、これはどんな扱いになっていると 判断できるのでしょうか？ お願いします💦

(As a result), veteran players face difficulties later in life (due to injuries S V especially problems [with their brains]). 0 因果表現 訳 その結果,ベテラン選手たちはのちの人生において,損傷,特に脳疾患による困 難に直面するのである。 noilingintini o Hym 語句 that as a result 結果として / veteran 形 経験豊かな文字どおり 「ベテランの」 です。 / face 損傷/especially 副 とりわけ 直面する / later in life のちの人生で due to ~ ~ が原因で/injury RIFER

promisingの具体的な内容が下のオレンジの部分となっているのですが、上の緑の部分がだめな理由をどなたか教えてください。

20 15 Rothblatt believes that within twenty years, "mind clones*" will be humanity's biggest invention. (2) The concept of cloning human brains and placing them inside robotic bodies has been described in numerous science fiction works. However, Google director Ray Kurzweil believes that our bodies may be replaced by machines 第2段落 P P C ロスプラットは「頭脳 クローン」が人類最大 の発明になると信じて いる。 グーグル社の 人々の身体はやがて様 重役カーツワイルも、 械に置き換わり、デジ タル的に不死身となる。 人間が現れると信じて いる。 彼は著書の中 で、超知的な「トラン スヒューマン」が様々 な問題を解決すると同 時に、通常の人間をご within ninety years and that some people will become digitally immortal*. His 1999 book The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence describes one possible future in which the boundaries between biological human intelligence and digital artificial intelligence blur*. Kurzweil mentions a possible 流の市民だと見なす future that seems both (3) promising and terrifying. If super intelligent transhumans* become hundreds of times smarter, many problems such as hunger, war, and pollution 【前途有望な未来像】 could be solved. However, (4)there is no guarantee that such computer-based 【恐ろしい未来像①】 ↑ intelligence would act “fairly” by ordinary human standards. According to Kurzweil, during the late 21st century humans who become part of super-intelligent AIsystems* 【恐ろしい未来像②】 来像を描いている。 might start to regard ordinary humans as second-class citizens. At some point, 25 ordinary people simply will not be able to keep up with the super-intelligent 【恐ろしい未来像③】 ↑ "transhumans." If you had the choice and could afford it, would you upload your own consciousness onto a computer? Would you like to purchase a robotic version brofis of yourself?

初めの文のthat節内の構文がとれなくて困ってます。どうか教えてください🙇

Consider, for example, that the existence of a single human thought requires the highly complex interaction of hundreds of thousands of neurons]. (In order to separate mind from brain), it would be necessary to think of each neuron (as something distinct from its function), which is a little like [trying to separate the seawater (that provides the substance of an ocean wave) from the energy (that gives the wave its shape and motion)]. The existence of the wave requires both elements: (without energy), the wave would fall flat; (without water), the wave energy would have no expression. 仮定法過去 仮定法過去

十分に英文解釈できてるとは思うのですが、あえて、さらに細かくやるとなった時、4行目のan inner〜self.のところはどうなりますか。

脳の As the human brain evolved something remarkable happened: the brain, with its great perceptual powers), began to perceive its own existence, and human beings gained the ability to reflect, as if from a distance), upon [the perceptions (produced by their own brains)]. (T There seems to be, (within the human head), an inner, personal awareness, an independent, observant self. We have come to think of this self, (with all its emotions, sensations, and thoughts), (as the phenomenon of "mind.") think of AasB「AをBと考える」

なぜ、suggesting になるのかがわかりません💦

英語 About seven years ago I started learning how to paint as a hobby: I was pretty terrible. Everything looked flat, I did not have the right proportions, and my colors were totally off. My friends and colleagues suggested that I stop wasting my time (a ) something I wasn't good at. "Focus on your day job," they said. I kept at it practicing, taking classes, finding the right teachers who could teach and challenge me Over five years, painting started to become intuitive", and surprisingly, I am now considered "good." Today, the same friends say I was born with this talent. "You're in the wrong profession," one said recently. The same thing happened when I started piano and singing lessons a couple of years ago. Comments shifted from. "Stop wasting your time and focus on what you know," to "You've got a musical talent." (A These comments originate from long-held beliefs that growth is largely not possible for adults. Even when there is evidence of learning, it can be caused by talent from birth, like the comments that I received suggested. Most scientific studies on adulthood focus on cognitive maintenance or decline, rather than growth. (b) that even scientists may think that development is severely limited in adulthood. The prevailing" mentality is represented by proverbs, such as "use it or lose it," or worse, "old dogs can't learn new tricks." A few recent studies, such as ones by Arne May and Denise Park, ( C ) suggest that learning new skills, such as juggling or photography, for even three months may strengthen brain functioning in adults. (B) I would take these studies one step further to argue that an important cause of cognitive

早急に知りたいです🙌問題の答え教えてください(՞ ܸ.‪ˬ.ܸ՞)”

3. 指定された文字で始まり、 定義にあてはまる 単語を書きなさい。 (1) a small life that usually has six legs and some wings • (知識 判断) (i) (2) to damage something so badly or break down something (3) to watch something carefully (d) (o) (4) the organ inside the head that controls movement, though, memory feeling (b) (5) to have or use something with other people (s)

shouldの意味を教えてください🙏🙇 推量なのか〜すべきなのかどっちの意味か分かんないです

deprived of oxygen 18 the brain dies. S+be 動詞が省略された once+過去分詞の形に注意。 6 It is natural that +S+should+動詞の原形 「Sが~するのは当然だ」 7 cf. It is natural that+S+ should have+過去分詞 「Sが〜したのは当然だ」 ffond to L +N 411