aの2とbの3が分からないので教えてください🙇‍♀️

B この塔は300年前に建てられた。 centuries ago. School rules must be followed. 校則は守られなければならない。 表現です。 ②無生物主語: 「〈物事〉 が 〈人〉 に・・・させる」 が……する」 を表す形。 客観的に因果関係を示す。 「〈物事〉 のために 〈人〉 ニュースや新聞などで よく使われます。 The scholarship enabled her to go on to college. その奨学金のおかげで彼女は大学へ進学できた。 = Thanks to the scholarship, she was able to go on to college.) Illness prevented me from going to school. 病気のため私は学校に行けなかった。 (=Because of illness, I couldn't go to school.) Work it Qui Complate the sentences below using the words in the brackets. The book 2. This book by Stephen King. [write] using various stories of Indian gods and goddesses. [tell] Arrange the words and phrases in the parentheses to match the Japanese. 1. これらの恐竜の化石がどのように発見されたかを楽しく読んでみてください。 Enjoy (were / these dinosaur fossils/how/found/ reading). Enjoy (ewen orlt (nodend 2. この本はこのような複雑な科学を網羅的にまとめてくれています。 (a well-rounded summary / provides / this book / of) these complicated sciences. these complicated sciences. 3. かなり怖いですが, あと少しの恐怖が話をよりいっそうおもしろくしていたでしょう。 It was quite frightening, but (have made / more horridness / would / the story/a little/better). It was quite frightening, but Jode etow glosin WEBSASUBI ssd evad alpaido yncM

四角の2について 青い線を弾きましたが、なぜ英国を1とするのでしょうか？

2 0.58倍 〇 0.94 倍 19.8% 【OECD 諸国におけるハイテク産業別輸出額占有率(2003年)】 6.0% 7.4% 1 (ドル) 全製造業合計 14.3% 15.1% 47.4% 4兆5,642億 日本 米国 6.6% 11.5% 11.4% 8.4% ドイツ 全ハイテク産業 20.4% 41.6% 1兆1,417億 フランス 1.5% 英国 航空宇宙産業 33.7% 14.9% 14.7% 17.5% 17.7% 1,513億 その他 4.3% 9.3% 1 5.6% 電子機器 19.0% 19.8% 42.0% 3,780億 3.3% 11.5% 9.3% 1 7.6% 事務機器・ 19.5% 48.8% 電子計算機 2,101億 2.1% 9.4% 1 9.9% 医薬品 12.2% 56.2% 2,028億 L 10.2% 医用・精密・ 5.6% 6.2% 光学機器等 13.9% 22.8% 15.0% 36.5% (『平成18年版 科学技術白書文 部科学省) 日本の全ハイテク産業の輸出額は、英国の全ハイテク産業の輸出額と比べて、およそ 注:輸出額はドル換算されている。 資料: OECD 「Main Science and Technology Indicators」、 「STAN Database」 1,995億 2

英文を添削してください。

(4) In general, regulatory part in definition of a proper use harmony Supporting Tives part in in a new science of science 3 plays a technology, which plays a government. If is with people, and fair discipline.

至急！！私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです！！科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

至急！！私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです！！科目は英語です。

プペンシルで解 people than ever can find an audience time filled with disasters, online, "conspiracy theories seem to be growing crazier by the day. We also tend to believe in such things under increased stress, which is unfortunate because many of these ideas are Some conspiracy theorists pride themselves on being "critical freethinkers," but a new damaging our democracies and ourselves. study showing a connection between lower critical thinking skills and increased conspiracy (2) theory belief suggests this may not be the case. "Conspiracy theories refer to attempts to explain the ultimate cause of an important event (social, political, climatic, etc.) by accusing a hidden group of perceived evil, powerful people or organizations of having secretly planned and carried out these events," say Paris Nanterre University psychologist Anthony Lantian and team in their paper. two studies, the researchers tested the critical thinking skills of 338 a French version of the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test. They then scored the students' tendencies towards conspiracy beliefs and their personal Across undergraduate students (4) the objective analysis and assessment of their own critical thinking skills. Critical thinking. evaluation of a situation requires a collection of cognitive skills. These include the ability to distinguish between relevant versus irrelevant information, think systematically, see other perspectives, recognize and avoid logical *fallacies, look beyond the obvious, be aware of and avoid biases, and change your mind in light of new evidence. "The more people believe in conspiracy theories, the worse they perform on a critical thinking ability test," Lantian said. "This test is characterized by an *open-ended format highlighting several areas of critical thinking ability in the context of argumentation." (6) All this is not to say that those with high critical thinking skills can't also be sucked into believing things that may not necessarily be true. The way (7) [is wired /a/ makes / thinking/ social species / our / as] us very vulnerable to believing those we identify with as part of our own cultural group- no matter how much education we have had that boosts science literacy. Trust plays a massive role in who we believe. We also have a tendency to believe each of us is above average at detecting misinformation, which can't possibly be true. Researchers have also linked this need to feel special to greater belief in conspiracies. Lantian and team point out that while their study suggests critical thinking lowers Deople's chances of believing in untrue conspiracy theories, the findings don't determine if (8) (9) た場合,そ 数学【数学 験番号 【化学 b てお 3 In a more (1) ① 次の英文を読んで、下の設問に答えなさい。 1 - (3) the po no a E

ポレポレの例題26番についてです なぜif not〜の節はofまでなんですか？参考書の説明やYouTubeで調べましたがよく分かりませんでした positiveで切っても良くないですか？

例題26 There is general apathy to if not positive distrust of FAU science itself as a search for truth; for, to the ordinary 010 American, science is identified with mechanical inventions. Ask an American to name the greatest scientist of this country and he will very likely reply, "Edison." As a nation, we respect only the practical application of science and have regard for the efforts of inventors and promoters rather than those of the scientific discoverers. 早稲田大>

大学受験の長文問題です。 解答がないので答えをお願いします🙏

問題 3 以下の英文を読んで、次の問いに答えなさい。 (*のついた語には語注が ある。) If you are able to step outside and hear many types of birds, you might also have a greater feeling of well-being. Two studies show that hearing diverse birdsongs may help increase our happiness. (A) One study was done by researchers at California Polytechnic State University. A research team studied the effects of birdsong ( 1 ) people walking through a park in the U.S. state of Colorado. A biology graduate student, Danielle Ferraro, led the study. "There could be an evolutionary reason why we like birdsong so much. And the idea is that when we hear birdsong it could signal safety to us," Ferraro says. There could be many other reasons, too. Ferraro states that in some areas around the world birdsong can also signal the arrival of spring and nice weather. Bird diversity, she adds, can also mean a healthy environment. She explained her study to Voice of America (VOA). Ferraro and her team played recorded songs from a diverse group of birds native to the area. They did this on hiking trails in a park in Boulder, Colorado. (2) several weeks, the researchers played recorded birdsong at certain times of the day and other times they did not. Then they talked with hikers after they ( 3 ). Hikers who heard the recorded diverse birdsongs reported a greater sense of well-being than the people who heard simply the natural birds. The researchers suggest that both the bird sounds and biodiversity* can increase feelings of well-being. Ferraro explained that she used native birdsong for the study. This way it would sound as natural as possible. They also did the study during the summer. She explains why this is important. "So the study ( 4 ) in the summer and that's kind of important because the spring is most birds' breeding* season. And if we play the birdsong during breeding season, that might have disturbed them. (B) We didn't want to disturb the birds too much." The study was published in an academic journal called the Royal Society B in December 2020. - 10- ◇M2 (310-15)

as in he own case がよくわかりません。asの後にinはいいんですか？それとこの文のに関する3位目の写真の問題の解説に効果的な治療法が行われていなかったと書かれているんですが行われていないって言うのがどこの部分から読み取ったのかわかりません。③の予防可能であ... 続きを読む

114 放送された英文 John Wilson was an Englishman who worked to prevent blindnes VI S. in the developing world. When he was 12 years old he was blinded in both eyes during an experiment in science class.) After that, he went to a school for the blind where he learned Braille, which is the writing system for people who can't see. Then he studied law at Oxford University. After Wilson graduated, he went to Africa. There, he was shocked to find widespread blindness hot caused by accidents, as in his own case, TUTT but resulting from the lack of effective treatment for certain diseases. For decades, he led an organization to prevent such blindness in Africa

②➂④を教えて下さい！

4 読解力 Rさんは、ホウ酸5gと硫酸銅5gをはか りとり、それぞれ60℃の水25gに溶かす実 験を計画し、溶けるかどうか予想してみた。 60℃の水25gには、ホウ酸は( )g,硫酸 銅は()gまで溶けることから,Rさんは, ホウ酸は5g全ては溶けきらずに残ると予想 した。 なお,図1は、いろいろな物質の溶解度 をグラフに表したもので、ホウ酸と硫酸銅の 詳しい溶解度の値は, 表1 のようになる。 硝酸カリウム 100g 水に溶ける質量( 溶解度と再結晶 1 次の文章を読んで、 問いに答えなさい。 100 80 60 20 40 20 40 温度 (℃) 図1 いろいろな物質の溶解度曲線 塩化ナトリウム 硫酸銅 60 ホウ酸 80 表1 ホウ酸と硫酸銅の溶解度 (100gの水に溶 ける質量) 温度(℃) 0 20 40 60 ホウ酸〔g〕 2.8 4.9 8.9 14.9 硫酸銅 〔g〕 23.8 80 23.5 35.7 53.6 80.5 128 ① 上の文章の空欄にあてはまる数値を記入しなさ い。 なお、数値は小数第1位まで求めなさい。 計画に沿って, 実験を行ったところ, ホウ 酸は溶け残った。 Rさんは、溶け残ったホウ れば, 酸水浴 とができると考えて水溶液を加し ●ホウ酸5gは水呂におよそ同じで から考えなさい。 また, その温 ホウ酸の水溶液はどのようになってい るか答えなさい。 ホウ酸硫酸 Rさんは, 度曲線から, 冷却したとき結晶が出て 考えた。 ホウ酸5gと硫酸銅5g れ水25gに溶かしきった水溶液を20 冷やした結果, ホウ酸は結晶が得られた 硫酸銅は結晶が得られなかった。 図1 火山ガスとは ③水25gに5gのホウ酸を溶かしきった を20℃まで冷却したときの実験結果の して、正しいものは次のうちどれか。 アホウ酸は20℃の水25gに1.2gしか いため, 3.8gの結晶が得られた。 イホウ酸は20℃の水25gに 4.9gしか いため, 0.1 g の結晶が得られた。 ウホウ酸は20℃の水25gに 1.0gしか いため, 4.0g の結晶が得られた。 エホウ酸は20℃の水25gに 8.9g溶ける 結晶は得られなかった。 火山地帯では, いる。 地表に向け に溶けていた気 を火山ガスとい ★1 ふんしゅつ に溶けていたニ 火山ガスの噴出 火山ガスの種類 ふつう 火山 二酸化炭素が2 スの温度や いおう りゅうか 化硫黄と硫化: の火山ガスに と、少量のメ ンなども火山 大規模な喧 スも多い。 は,2000年 の間は1日 の二酸化硫 100000k 火山ガス 素から硫 は黄色い石 火山ガス・ 二酸化 くさ は腐った 吸いこむ せやす 次にRさんは,硫酸銅も条件を変えるこ で、冷やしたときに結晶が得られると考え 実験したところ, 結晶が得られた。 つながる × Science Pre ④ 硫酸銅の結晶を得るために, Rさんが行っ 験は次のうちどれか。 ア硫酸銅は5g,水は25g,水の温度を とし､水溶液を20℃まで冷却する。 硫酸銅は5g, 水は25g,水の温度を とし、水溶液を40℃まで冷却する。 硫酸銅は15g,水は25g,水の温度を とし、水溶液を20℃ま で冷却する。 硫酸銅は5, 水は100g, 水の温度 ℃とし、水溶液を20℃まで冷却する。 二酸ｲ いため、 い｡ 火 場所で めるよ らない

並べ替えの問題がわかりません🥲教えてくださいお願いします🙇‍♀️

rmativ nt Each of us carries just over 20,000 genes that encode everything from the keratin in our hair down to the muscle fibers in our toes. It's no great (1) (own / came / where / from / our / mystery / genes): our parents bequeathed them to us. And our parents, in turn, got their s genes from their parents. But where along that genealogical line did each of those 20,000 protein-coding genes get its start? That question has hung over the science of genetics (2) (ago / dawn / century / since / a / ever / its). "It's a basic question of life: how evolution generates 1 novelty," said Diethard Tautz of the Max Planck Institute for 10 Evolutionary Biology in Plön, Germany. New studies are now bringing the answer into focus. Some of our genes are immensely old, perhaps (3) (to / way / back / dating / all the / the) earliest chapters of life on earth. But a surprising number of genes emerged more recently. many in just the past few million years. The youngest evolved after our 15 own species broke off from our cousins, the apes. Scientists (4) (being / finding / into / are / genes / come / new) at an unexpectedly fast clip. And once they evolve, they can quickly take on essential functions. Investigating how new genes (5) (understand / help / become / scientists / important / may / so) the role they may play in diseases like cancer. [1] Read the passage and rearrange the seven words in (1) - (5) in the correct order. Then choose from 1-4 the option that contains the third and fifth words. (1) 13rd: our (2) (3) (4) (5) 5th: genes 3rd: ago 5th: since 3rd: back 5th: the 2 3rd: where 5th: came 2 3rd: its 5th: ever 23rd: the 5th: back 2 3rd: genes 5th: into 1 3rd: genes 5th: being 1 3rd: may 5th: scientists 3 3rd: scientists 5th: understand 3 3rd: genes 5th: from 3 3rd: its 5th: a 3 3rd: way 5th: back 3 3rd: finding 5th: genes 23rd: important 5th: help 43rd: help 3rd: own 5th: came 3rd: came 5th: dawn 43rd: the 5th: the 4 3rd: new 5th: come 5th: understand may may understand thep (早稲田大) wystery. ne TOL Recome Sc