学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0
TOEIC・英語 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

英検準1級ライティングの添削をお願いしたいです!何を書いているか全くわからなければ、言ってもらえると… あと、筆記試験90分の間でライティングを書かないといけないんですけど、本当にライティングが苦手で、少しでも短時間で良い文章を書くコツを教えてください!具体的に言えば、英文... 続きを読む

Write an essay on the given TOPIC. OUse TWO of the POINTS below to support your answer. Structure: introduction, main body, and conclusion Suggested length: 120-150 words TOPIC or disagree: More companies will allow employees to work from 情報セキュグ 危ない disag Agree home in the future POINTS ●Information security Communication Recruitment Cost reduction I do 1 仕事の内容の 外部漏れの危険 1 not agree home in the future and I have two reasons to support Day 2 Day 3 ・直接コミュニケーションをとれない一誤解を招くおそれ (記録をしないと) 相手と商談や会議等の連絡をメールや コスト削減。 電話しないといけない手間がかかる。 Day that more companies will allow employees to work from 4 this opinion... on One of the reason is that employees cannot communicate on meet easily. They have to keep in touch with partner about importan things such as meetings the phone or e-mail, so they might take so much time to do this. Also, might make mistakes if they do not communicate on the phones or e-mail without s keep records of communication. Day they Another of the reason is that it companies might need to improve employees houses information security.. If do not do this, documents might be seen by companies many people such as employees' familys, and visitors to them, For these reasons abore, more companies will not allow employees to work from home if these problems are solved. total: 143 words Da 6

未解決 回答数: 0
TOEIC・英語 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

英検準1級のライティングです。 どなたでも構いません。添削をお願いしたいです!何を書いているか分からなければ、聞いてもらって全然大丈夫です。ていうか、読んだだけでは、全く理解できないと思います。 近日中に受けるので、明日の夕方頃までにお願いします🙏

Write an essay on the given TOPIC. Use TWO of the POINTS below to support your answer. Structure: introduction, main body, and conclusion Suggested length: 120-150 words TOPIC Do you think that gas-powered cars will be replaced by electric cars in the near future? 電時の排出 POINTS 走行エネルギーの asse). Environment Convenience #1124-Kat #veg Cost Industry 高速産 ・充電せった コストが高い 産業限られた 短いきが しが ・使用者が買いかえようとは 思わない 2:33. 1 充電スペースの 2015 3. cars will be replaced by electric cars I do not think that gas-powered opinion. in the near future, I have two reasons to support this One reason is that it may be not convenient for people to drive electric cars in these days society. For example, electric cars take more time to charge than gas-powered cars. Moreover, electric cars can run few distance. Onother reason is that electric cars cost a lot of money in the many situation. For example, people who use electric, cars usually sex charging places at the each houses, but they have to pay so much cash to do it, Also, they need to prepare too much money every month to charge electric Propte cash, For these reasons above, I believe that gas-powered cars will be replaced by electric cars in the near future. total: 179 words

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

しっかり理解のところ 名詞 whom/which to do はないんですか? 名詞 前置詞 whom/which to do だけですか?

249 発展 Pets should not be given more food will gain too much weight. 1 which 3 than Section 075 250 発展 ② that ④ what (a) Mary needs a well-equipped office to work in. (b) Mary needs a well-equipped office ( )( ) to work. しっかり理解 | 011 名詞+前置詞+ whom/which to do olms i [terlas Nood 〈名詞+前置詞+ whom/which to do〉の表現は,以下のような変形で理解すればよい。 (例1) I am looking for a partner with whom to work. 「私は一緒に働くパートナーを探している」 I work with a partner. 「私はパートナーと一緒に働く」(文) ATO (例2) Wealth is just a means by which to enjoy life. 「富とは人生を楽しむための手段にすぎない」 → a partner with whom I work 「私が一緒に働くパートナー」(関係詞節) → a partner with whom to work 「一緒に働く (ための) パートナー」 * I work が to work に変わったと考える。 Section 076 251 is dou MAP 例外のない規則など存在しない。 You enjoy life by a means. 「あなたはある手段で人生を楽しむ」(文) → a means by which you enjoy life 「あなたが人生を楽しむ (ための)手段」(関係詞節 → a means by which to enjoy life 「人生を楽しむ(ための)手段」 * you enjoy life が to enjoy life に変わったと考える。 You should give this CD to ( ) wants it. 1 who ② whom ③ whoever 4 whomever 24 <東京家政学院

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

250番 Mary needs a well equipped office to work in. はwork in の目的語のoffice が省略されている形ですよね。 後、冠詞のaってどういうときに使いますか?

248 発展 249 RIN There is (has / rule/exceptions/1 発展 |Pets should not be given more food ( ) they need. Otherwise, they weight. will gain too much ① which than Section 075 250 (2) that (4) what (a) Mary needs a well-equipped office to work in. (b) Mary needs a well-equipped office ( )( ) to work. (例2) Wealth is just a means by which to enjoy life. 「富とは人生を楽しむための手段にすぎない」 しっかり理解 011 名詞+前置詞 + whom/which to do 〈名詞+前置詞+ whom/which to do> の表現は、以下のような変形で理解すればよい。 (例1) Ⅰam looking for a partner with whom to work. 「私は一緒に働くパートナーを探している」 I work with a partner. 「私はパートナーと一緒に働く」(文) → a partner with whom I work 「私が一緒に働くパートナー」(関係詞節) → a partner with whom to work 「一緒に働く (ための) パートナー」 * I work が to work に変わったと考える。 You enjoy life by a means. 「あなたはある手段で人生を楽しむ」 (文) → a means by which you enjoy life 「あなたが人生を楽しむ (ための手段」 → a means by which to enjoy life 「人生を楽しむための)手段」 * you enjoy life が to enjoy life に変わったと考える。 Section 076 251 You should give this CD to ( ① who 3 whoever W <南山大 W <山梨大) 24

未解決 回答数: 0