学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

英語に自信がある人回答づくりお願いします! ※書き込みは気にしないでください。 これプラス、問題に続きがあって、 問5 本文には、実物の動物を見ることによって人々がより深く理解できることが3つ書かれています。それらを日本語で答えなさい。 問6 本文には、動物園... 続きを読む

第4問 次の英文を読んで、 設問に答えなさい。①~6は段落番号です。 黒体 6) のIn my view, (1)it_is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in gon.. ie parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild. 'Animals in ood z0os get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required. and anv 1pesses they might have will be treated.Their movement might be somewhat restricted. mt they have a safe environment in which to live, and they are spared bullying and social 神年 predators*2 or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal racism*1 by others of their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. Alot of very nasty things happen to truly wild' animals that simply don't happen in good zoos, and to view a life that is 'free' as 術保者一 one that is automatically ‘good' is, I think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes. の Firstly, zoos aid conservation. Colossal numbers of species are becoming extinct across the world, and many more are increasingly threatened and therefore risk extinction. Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day. Aspecies protected in captivity can be bred up to provide a reservoir*3 population against a population crash or extinction in the wild. A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many ofthese livinginzoos. Stillmore only exist in the wildbecause they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been1o0osted by captive bred animals Without (2these efforts there would be fewer species alive today. Although reintroduction successes are few and far between*4, the numbers are increasing, and the very fact that species have been saved or reintroduced as a result of captive breeding proves the value of such initiatives. ③ Zoos alsoprovide education. Many children and adults, especially those in cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeinga living creature in the flesh*5, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts and how they can contribute. ④ Inaddition to this, there isalsothe education that cantake place in Z0Osthrough signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and 8.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

英語に自信がある人回答づくりお願いします! ※書き込みは気にしないでください。 これプラス、問題に続きがあって、 問5 本文には、実物の動物を見ることによって人々がより深く理解できることが3つ書かれています。それらを日本語で答えなさい。 問6 本文には、動物園... 続きを読む

第4問 次の英文を読んで、 設問に答えなさい。①~6は段落番号です。 黒体 6) のIn my view, (1)it_is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in gon.. ie parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild. 'Animals in ood z0os get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required. and anv 1pesses they might have will be treated.Their movement might be somewhat restricted. mt they have a safe environment in which to live, and they are spared bullying and social 神年 predators*2 or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal racism*1 by others of their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. Alot of very nasty things happen to truly wild' animals that simply don't happen in good zoos, and to view a life that is 'free' as 術保者一 one that is automatically ‘good' is, I think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes. の Firstly, zoos aid conservation. Colossal numbers of species are becoming extinct across the world, and many more are increasingly threatened and therefore risk extinction. Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day. Aspecies protected in captivity can be bred up to provide a reservoir*3 population against a population crash or extinction in the wild. A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many ofthese livinginzoos. Stillmore only exist in the wildbecause they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been1o0osted by captive bred animals Without (2these efforts there would be fewer species alive today. Although reintroduction successes are few and far between*4, the numbers are increasing, and the very fact that species have been saved or reintroduced as a result of captive breeding proves the value of such initiatives. ③ Zoos alsoprovide education. Many children and adults, especially those in cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeinga living creature in the flesh*5, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts and how they can contribute. ④ Inaddition to this, there isalsothe education that cantake place in Z0Osthrough signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and 8.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

英語に自信がある人回答づくりお願いします! ※書き込みは気にしないでください。 これプラス、問題に続きがあって、 問5 本文には、実物の動物を見ることによって人々がより深く理解できることが3つ書かれています。それらを日本語で答えなさい。 問6 本文には、動物園... 続きを読む

第4問 次の英文を読んで、 設問に答えなさい。①~6は段落番号です。 黒体 6) のIn my view, (1)it_is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in gon.. ie parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild. 'Animals in ood z0os get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required. and anv 1pesses they might have will be treated.Their movement might be somewhat restricted. mt they have a safe environment in which to live, and they are spared bullying and social 神年 predators*2 or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal racism*1 by others of their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. Alot of very nasty things happen to truly wild' animals that simply don't happen in good zoos, and to view a life that is 'free' as 術保者一 one that is automatically ‘good' is, I think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes. の Firstly, zoos aid conservation. Colossal numbers of species are becoming extinct across the world, and many more are increasingly threatened and therefore risk extinction. Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day. Aspecies protected in captivity can be bred up to provide a reservoir*3 population against a population crash or extinction in the wild. A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many ofthese livinginzoos. Stillmore only exist in the wildbecause they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been1o0osted by captive bred animals Without (2these efforts there would be fewer species alive today. Although reintroduction successes are few and far between*4, the numbers are increasing, and the very fact that species have been saved or reintroduced as a result of captive breeding proves the value of such initiatives. ③ Zoos alsoprovide education. Many children and adults, especially those in cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeinga living creature in the flesh*5, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts and how they can contribute. ④ Inaddition to this, there isalsothe education that cantake place in Z0Osthrough signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and 8.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

文構造について教えて頂けないでしょうか?🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️ But they have at least become central to a peace process often marked by bickering over more trivial ma... 続きを読む

4 122 @natural1-25 勢 Politics&lntemational Affirs devzan Bomb blast diplomacy ) W itishard (to be on good terms with the 義ebne2i ey keep SW your house) Yet, since 2003/Imdia has sought to make friends iith PakistamW上continuing to Remse it Of abettinglhideousibomb 二KaGKSTin 穫 cities Pakistan brshes these 8EGHsations 8Side, il at the same time promising not to allow its EEOIKCO be used baSe forWterFismyy This attitude maKes the bombings seem an inSuperable obstacleto peace. They may yet prove so. But te? have at least become centralfto a peace TOGeSSyoftcn 本Kby bickeringiQver more 細設細| matters> (77,e coo7is7。 101 words) be on good terms with 一「と友好関係を持つ」 blow up 一「を爆破する」 make friends with 一「と親しくなる, 一と友達になる」 while continuing ーー while India was continu を省略した文。 abet hideous bomb attacks 「憎むべき爆弾攻撃 | brush 一 aside 「一を無視する」 at the same time 「同時に」 as a base for terrorism 「テロのための其地として」 make 一 seem .. で,「一を…に見せる」 という意味。ここ ーのように見せる」 ということ。 口/6 insuperable 「越えられない, 克服できない] ロ77 They may yet prove so.「今に, 思った通りになるのかもしれない。」 ま だそうではないが, じきにそうなるかもしれないということ。yet はこ こでは「いつか, やがて」 の意味。 口77 become central to 一「一の中心となる」 昌/8 often marked by 以下で a peace process を説明している。 口/8 bicker over ー「一のことで言い争う」 口seek to .. …しようと努める 曲continue を続ける 口atditude 姿勢 草 process プロモス では「爆発を 爆弾 外交を爆破 隣国があなたの国の家々を爆破し続ける状態では, その国と友好関係を続け ることは難しい。しかし 2003 年以来インドは, インド国内の都市での僧むべ き爆弾攻撃を割甚しているとしてパキスタンへの非座をし続けながらも。 友好関 係を築こうと努めてきた。パキスタンは, こうした非難を無視する一方自国の 国土がテロの碁地として使用されるのを許さないことを約束してもいる。このよ うな姿府のせいで, 爆撃が越えがたい平得詞計鞭害であるように思える。今に 思った通りになるのかもしれない。しかし, 爆軟は少なくとも和 核的な問題となっている。往々にして, とのアロェャスてu舞 本雇記靖- 日が向けられるのだが。 インド・パキスタン戦争 (India-Pakistan wars) 第二次世界大戦 (World War l) 後、インド (India) とパキスタン (Pakistan) \ら独立した際に, カシミールがどちらの領有になるかという問題が勃発した。 > ルの首領はヒンドゥー教徒であったため, ヒンドゥー教 (Hinduism) を主体 とするインドへの帰属を決めたが, 住民の多くはイスラム教 (lslam) を信仰していた ためにイスラム教を主体とするパキスタンへの帰属を望んだ。しかしインド側はこれ を認めず. これまで 3 回の大規模な武力紛争が勃発した (カシミール紛争, Kashmir conflicts)。その後もインドは国際社会の介入や対話の席に着くことを拒否する姿勢を とり続け,、 これに反発するイスラム系の組織がインドを攻撃しているとされている。イ ンドはこのようなテロ行為 (terrorism) をパキスタン政府が支援していると非難して おり, 緊張関係はいまだ続いている。核保有国 (nuclear power) であるインド・パ キスタン間の今後の情勢が注視される。 cw 日 英文の内容に合う場合は True, 合わない場合は False を選びなさい。 India has been criticizing Pakistan for aiding bomb attacks, but Pakistan ignores this criticiSm. So India thinKs it is not possible to be on good terms with Pakistan. True / False 』 Answer は p.421 忌 に a】 3 | 123

解決済み 回答数: 1