第一文なのですが、understandの目的語がwhatなのになぜ日本語訳では知恵が目的語のように訳されているのでしょうか。 知恵によって一体何を理解するだろうか。 じゃだめなのでしょうか。

1 molten mesqoauto ayab al ponte tomiA 何 (を) 一人は を理解する によって知恵 good end snilong. What exactly do you understand ( by wisdom) ? O (副) (助) S Vt M CAL 第2文 ・直接売詞の働き 時間関係の把握 文の主要素の把 話す について それはである It is 特性 それを私達はよく a quality [that speak about, we often Vt S Vi C (関代) O S すべ しかし を持つ大変な 苦労 におけるを定義すること co but have great difficulty (in defining). (等) Vt M-> (名) (Vt) この課のポイントです。 that が speak about (直接的には前置詞 about) だけでな く動名詞 defining (→ 58課) の目的語にもなっていることがつかめれば文句なし。 第3文 ということ 子どもは 生まれる ・・・・なしでそれ みんなが を認める Everyone agrees S and 0 (接) Vt そしてということ それは [that S [ that children are born (without it)], M V (受) taw Lisdw] ei aidT 徐々に 身に付けられる(~)につれて私達がになるより年上 we grow older]]. (等) O (接) S (副) V (受) ( 過分) (接) S Vi C T.. it is gradually acquired[as 11課, 17 課, 24課, そして32課の復習になる文ですよ。 《全文訳》 知恵を一体どのように理解しているだろうか。 知恵は、話題にはするが定 義するのが非常に難しいことがよくある特性である。 誰もが,子どもは生まれな がらにして知恵が備わっているのではなく、 知恵は成長するにつれて少しずつ身 Chyloidve gaid に付くものである, ということを認めている。 【語句】 exactly 正確に (what exactly ... で,「一体何を･･･か」という意味合いで使う)/ ・・・ wisdom 图 知恵/quality 图 特性 / speak about Vt について話す/have difficulty (in) Ving 「Vするのに苦労する」 / define Vt を定義する / gradually acquire Vt を身に付ける 徐々に/

これは … whether we can … の倒置ですか？

"What I want to know is can we actually transform these structures into something] with true utility in the real world?" 「私が知りたいのは、これらの構造物を実社会で真 に役立つものに変えることができるかということ だ。

黄色マーカーの部分の文構造を解説していただきたいです。

intelligence that AI just doesn't get. Social and emotional intelligences, for 接する example-our understanding of different environments, how that influences our example our understanding 観察する feelings, and the way we observe and interact with other people based on how we believe they're feeling. So, a lot of it is about context. Our brains are in V ✓

下線部クの次のaccess〜のとこの訳が2枚目のカッコのとこだと思うんですけど、そこの「なかなかない」という訳がどこからきているかを教えてください

Mulky Today we live largely cut off from this spectacle, with smog and light pollution *obscuring our view of this *perpetual cosmic drama, the unfolding of which once seemed intimately connected to questions of both natural and social order. But if we want to see Mars as it appeared ancient humans, access to a clear night sky is only half of our problem. We also have to put ourselves in their minds. (ク) to (キ) [ 1 ] We have seen the surface of the Sun, the landscapes of Mars, the

英検2級英作文 添削お願いいたします🙏

TOPIC In Japan, some people say that famous tourist sites, such as castles and temples, should limit the number of visitors. Do you agree with this opinion?

下線部クの次のaccess〜の部分の訳で澄み切った空がなかなかない、という訳はどこからきているのか教えてください

thousand stars (カ) Milky Way galaxy, and the planets slowly making Today we live largely cut off from this spectacle, with smog and light pollution *obscuring our view of this *perpetual cosmic drama, the unfolding of which once seemed intimately connected to questions of both natural and social order. But if we want to see Mars as it appeared ancient humans, access to a clear night (ク) (キャ sky is only half of our problem. We also have to put ourselves in their minds. [ 1 ] We have seen the surface of the Sun, the landscapes of Mars, the atmospheres of Venus and even Jupiter. We've discovered moons around other planets, and have found icy ocean worlds among them. We've used modern physics (to *infer the existence of black holes, and have now even "seen" them (with powerful radio telescopes.) We know that stars are bright orbs powered by *thermonuclear fusion. We know that within the observable universe, many billions of them (a septillion, in fact, with twenty-four zeros) are packed into 170

カッコで囲んだとこの英文の1つ目のandからの訳がどうして2枚目のようになるのか教えてください。 2枚目のどんな疑問が重要か〜の次のとこからです

ample practices varied across time and place. The truth is that we about what preliterate societies knew or believed. But they left behind *. evidence of their attention to the movements of the Sun and the phases of the Moon. And we can be sure that whatever questions they asked of the heavens were very different from those that motivate space exploration today. (A) rotic othe In reality, the difference between ancient and modern knowledge systems is more qualitative than quantitative; it is not about how much is known, but about what questions are important and about the acceptable ways of asking and answering those questions. And while we may not easily be able to slip between our modern worldview and those of others, we can nonetheless attempt to do so by asking not what ancient people knew about the world, but what their questions were when they looked at it. If we do this in the case of Mars, examining a few of the earliest known examples from around the world, we can see how sky knowledge was considered important to the functioning of the state whether it was *astrological knowledge in the service of good governance, or knowledge of bloodlines and relationships with the gods and other sky entities, which was used (B) - verdd

横向きでごめんなさい！この文の4)なのですが、beforeはuntilにしてもいいのでしょうか？使っている問題集に同じような文なのにbeforeとuntilが使われているものどっちもあって混乱しています。調べたらuntilにはsvがついてbeforeには名詞が続くとあったの... 続きを読む

結果 > ったか、バスはもう出てしまっていた。 〈過去のある時点までの完了・ [英作] 1) (He) had not [hadn't cleaned his room (for) more than a month[over a month] 2) (I) had seen Takuya in a photo[picture] [Takuya's photo / a photo of Takuya] (before)(, so I recognized him right away.) 3) When I got [camel home last night, everybody had (already) gone to bed. 4) I had never eaten [had such a big hamburger before I went to visited] the US[the States/ America]. 5) We had been playing baseball (for) about an hour when it started began] raining[started/ began to rain]. 解説 1) 過去のある時点までの継続。 clean は動作動詞だが,否定文では状態の継続の意味で使える。 2-3 2) 過去のある時点までの経験。→2-23) 過去のある時点までの完了・結果。 2-1 4)過去のある時点までの経験。 「アメリカ」は正式名称が the United States of America だが 2-25) 過去のある時点までの動作 the US と言うことが多い。

forで表す場合にfor about three months begining in early springとなる文がありますが文法構造がわからないです。for〜monthsが副詞なのは予想がつきますが、begining〜からの部分がどのような機能をしているのか分からな... 続きを読む

Bouring] で生じた) れている。 × the last [past] three months or so forは単なる時の足を表すはNG . learned French in six weeks. 「私は6週間でフランス語を身に付けた」 「春先から今に至るまでのほぼ3ヶ月余り]oti in 春先からの特定の3ヵ月 an at ym 特定 the three months or so tant a'or (since . early spring mis • for 切れ目なく!!!! • about [nearly] three months three months or so since early spring the beginning [start] of spring since を用いて 〈起点〉を表しているので、 「ここ, 最近」 は冗長で不自然! 同格 spring camel privatej pndiaiv Toora rigid onoj ni • beginning in early spring 表現がなるだけで同じことを言ってい wow 8 X since early spring early spring Until how コンマなしで for と since を組み合わせるのは

❌の部分が全くわかりません。教えていただけないでしょうか？

Choose a suitable form of can, could, be able to, manage to or succeed in to complete the sentences. 1) The manager was somewhat reluctant but in the end I get a refund. : manage to 2) It was annoying; I get on to any of the websites you recommended. : could 3) When does the next match start? I : was able to X X hardly hear the last announcement.