学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

ここのaとtheの部分をどっちかえらぶもんだいがでました。どっちがどっちなのかどうやってわかるんですか?不特定か特定って書いてあったけど、そしたら逆なんですけど

しています。 bioche 10 The critical-care community is thankful for Justice Shaw's decision, S V (s) (v)- C v- (because people deserve to know (when death occurs)). 2 Death itself is is simply to a certainty, and to remove the certainty of 〈when it occurs〉 perpetuate the avoidance of its reality. 3 Critical care advances have saved many lives, but we cannot tolerate the existence of technological care [to S S S prevent us from knowing (when someone has died)]. 4 Modern medicine requires 〈that we understand its limits together〉. V s、 訳 人はいつ死が起こるのかを知る権利があるので、集中治療に携わる人々はショー 裁判官の決定に感謝している2死そのものは確実に起きることであって、それがいつ起き るかの確実性を取り除くことは、単にその現実を永久に回避することにすぎない! 3集中治 療の進歩によって多くの命が救われてきたが,私たちは,人がどの時点で死亡したのかが わからなくなるような技術を使った医療の存在を容認することはできない。 現代医療は, 私たちがその限界も併せて理解することを必要としている。 week after o rejecto contin J her b Justi and prin SOC the ou tha 永続させる/ Co n 語句 2-certainty 確実なこと / remove 取り除く / perpetuate avoidance 圏 回避 /* advance 圈 進歩 / tolerate 容認する /<prevent 人 from-ing> 人が~することを妨げる 2 文法・構文 直訳「それ[死]がいつ起きるかの確実性を取り除く」→「死の定義を曖昧に したままにする」ということです。 perpetuate avoidance of its reality は, avoid its reality perpetually 「死の現実を永遠に避ける」を名詞化した表現です。 its とは modem medicine'sの代わりになる代名詞です。 「現代医療の限界」とは,前文で述べられた「現代 医療は人の命を救うことができる一方で,どの時点を死と定義するのかが曖昧になってし まうこと」です。 ain b an their identity hand che

解決済み 回答数: 2
英語 高校生

なぜ、suggesting になるのかがわかりません💦

英語 About seven years ago I started learning how to paint as a hobby: I was pretty terrible. Everything looked flat, I did not have the right proportions, and my colors were totally off. My friends and colleagues suggested that I stop wasting my time (a ) something I wasn't good at. "Focus on your day job," they said. I kept at it practicing, taking classes, finding the right teachers who could teach and challenge me Over five years, painting started to become intuitive", and surprisingly, I am now considered "good." Today, the same friends say I was born with this talent. "You're in the wrong profession," one said recently. The same thing happened when I started piano and singing lessons a couple of years ago. Comments shifted from. "Stop wasting your time and focus on what you know," to "You've got a musical talent." (A These comments originate from long-held beliefs that growth is largely not possible for adults. Even when there is evidence of learning, it can be caused by talent from birth, like the comments that I received suggested. Most scientific studies on adulthood focus on cognitive maintenance or decline, rather than growth. (b) that even scientists may think that development is severely limited in adulthood. The prevailing" mentality is represented by proverbs, such as "use it or lose it," or worse, "old dogs can't learn new tricks." A few recent studies, such as ones by Arne May and Denise Park, ( C ) suggest that learning new skills, such as juggling or photography, for even three months may strengthen brain functioning in adults. (B) I would take these studies one step further to argue that an important cause of cognitive

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

投げやりです。すいません。英語皆無なので代行してください。

【必答問題 5 日常使う物のデザインをする際には標準化 (standardization) という方法がある。 という内容に続く次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点44) If we examine the history of advances in all technological fields, we see that some improvements come naturally through the technology itself, while others come through standardization. The early history of the automobile is a good example. The first cars were very difficult to operate. They required strength and skill beyond the abilities of many. Some problems were solved through automation. Other aspects of cars and driving were standardized through the long process of international standards committees: . On which side of the road to drive (constant within countries) country, but variable across On which side f the car the driver sits (depends upon which side of the road the car is driven) -The (2) of essential components: steering wheel, brake, clutch, and accelerator (the same, whether on the left- or right-hand side of the car) Standardization is one type of cultural constraint. With standardization, once you have learned to drive one car, you feel confident that you can drive any car, anyplace in the world. Standardization provides a major breakthrough in usability. I have enough friends on national and international standards committees to realize that the process f determining an internationally accepted standard is laborious. Even when all members agree on the merits of standardization, the task of selecting standards becomes a long, political issue. A small company can standardize its products without too much difficulty, but it is much more difficult for an industrial, national, or international body to agree to standards. There even exists a standardized procedure for establishing national and international standards. organizations works on standards. First, a set of national and international Then when a new standard is proposed, it must work its way through each organization's approval process. Standards are usually the result of a *compromise among the various competing positions, which can often be an inferior compromise. Sometimes the answer is to agree on (4 ). Look at the existence I both metric and *English units; of left-hand- and 18 right-hand-drive automobiles. There are several international standards for the *voltages and *frequencies of electricity, and several different kinds of electrical plugs and sockets- which cannot interchanged. With all these difficulties and with the continual advances in technology, are standards really necessary? Yes, they are. Take the everyday, clock. It's standardized. Consider how much trouble you would have telling time with a backward clock, where the hands revolved "counterclockwise." A few such clocks exist, primarily as humorous conversation pieces. When a clock truly violates standards, such as (the one in Figure 1, it is difficult to determine what time is being displayed. Why? The logic behind the time display is identical to that of conventional clocks: there are only two differences - the hands move in the opposite direction (counterclockwise) and the location of "12," usually at the top, has been moved. This clock is just as logical as the standard one. It. bothers us because we have standardized on a different scheme, on the very definition of the term clockwise. Without such standardization, clock reading would be more difficult: you'd always have to figure out the "mapping. E) compromise *metric メートル法の *English units イギリスの計量法(ヤードボンド法) *frequencies of electricity 電気の周波数 voltages E *mapping 対応づけ (2つのものの間の関係を意味する専門用語) 問1 下線部(1)の内容を、 同じ段落の自動車の例に基づいて30字以内の日本語で答えよ。た だし、句読点も字数に数える。 問2 本文中の空所 (2) に入る語として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ 選び 記号で答えよ。 7 color イ location ウ price I sight (239) 問3 第2パラグラフ (Standardization is one type of ...) について 次の Question に対す る Answer となるように、空所に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エのうちから一 つ選び、 記号で答えよ。 Question: What is "a major breakthrough in usability" provided by standardization? Answer Because of standardization, you ( device of the same kind all over the world. 7 can apply what you have learned to イ can make cannot produce I cannot use what you have learned when using 問7 下線部(5)が表す図 (Figure 1)として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選 び記号で答えよ。 11 12 1 12 ) any machine or 10 2 10% 9 3 1 5 6 問4 下線部(3)の示す内容を, 40字程度の日本語で答えよ。 ただし, 句読点も字数に数える。 ウ 11 6 1 問5 次の文を第3パラグラフ (Ihave enough friends...) に入れるとき,本文中の①~ のうちのどの位置に入れるのが最も適当か、 次のア~エのうちから一つ選び, 記号 で答えよ。 9 3 Each step is complex, for if there are three ways of doing something, then there are sure to be strong proponents of each of the three ways, plus people who will argue that it is too early to standardize. 70 問8 最終パラグラフ (With all these difficulties...) の内容をもとに, 次の Question に2 語程度の英語一文で答えよ。 Question: According to the writer, why is the standardization of the everyday clo necessary? イ 2 ウ H O 問6 本文中の空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選び 記号で答えよ。 7 a single standard 1 several different standards ウ the same standard I too few standards <<-20-> <-21->

回答募集中 回答数: 0
1/38