31行のitは何を指していますか？itがthingを指しているのかとも思ったのですがそれだとundurstandの後に名詞の穴ができてしまっておかしいのではないかと思いました。教えて頂きたいです。

25 out of twenty native Alaskan languages, 冬の最 Although language extinction is sad for the people involved, why should the rest of us care? What effect will other people's language loss have on the future of people who (A): speak English, for example? Replacing a minor language with a more widespread ・ゆる可能 124) = permit . 20 one may even seem like a good thing, allowing people to communicate with each other more easily. But language diversity is as important as biological diversity. といい hot all ~70% Andrew Woodfield, director of the Centre for Theories of Language and Learning 1-14 in Bristol, England, suggested in a 1995 seminar on language conservation that people do not yet know all the ways in which linguistic diversity is important. "The fact is, no one knows exactly what riches are hidden inside the less-studied languages," he says. Woodfield compares one argument for conserving unstudied endangered plants - that they may be medically valuable with the argument for conserving endangered languages. We have inductive evidence based on past studies of well-known danguages that there will be riches, even though we do not know what they will be 単語 をだすことが It seems (B) 30 paradoxical but it's true. By allowing.languages to die out, the human race is destroying 便 4714 things doesn't understand," he argues. (243) Stephen Wurm, in his introduction to the Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger 1-1

1行目のinvolvedの前は関係代名詞の省略ということでしょうか？教えて頂きたいです。

Although language extinction is sad for the people involved, why should the rest of us care? What effect will other people's language loss have on the future of people who speak English, for example? (A) Replacing a minor language with a more widespread one may even seem like a good thing, allowing people to communicate with each other more easily. But language diversity is as important as biological diversity.

The old conception of national character based on biological differences he long been exploded; but differences of national character ari... 続きを読む

英語 高３ 先生のメモ付きで見ずらくてすみません💦 ・公共のガス灯は1800〜1807年間まで無かった ・鳴鳥や海鳥は落ちるまで旋回する ・毎年何十万もの（産まれたばかりの） ウミガメが海で迷子になる ・闇は仕事上は必要ないけど生活に 置いては光と同様に必... 続きを読む

Lesson 12 Light Pollution Class Name (1) If humans were truly at home under the light of the moon and stars, we would live in くつろぐ darkness happily. The midnight world would be as visible to us as it is to the vast number of No. nocturnal species on this planet. Instead, we are diurnal creatures, with eyes adapted to living in the sun's light. This is a basic evolutionary fact, even though most of us don't think of ourselves as diurnal beings any more than we think of ourselves as mammals. Yet it's the only way to explain what we've done to the night; we've engineered it by filling it with light so that we can へように be active at night. (2) This kind of engineering is similar to damming a river. Its benefits come with consequences に伴って起こる 結果 - called light pollution - the effects of which scientists are only now beginning to study. Light pollution is largely the result of bad lighting design, which allows artificial light to shine outward 人工的な and upward into the sky instead of focusing it downward. Badly designed lighting washes out the darkness of night and greatly alters the light levels and light rhythms, to which many forms of life, including humans, have adapted Wherever human light shines out into the natural world, some aspect of life, whether it is migration, breeding or feeding, is affected. whether A or B· A=·AD3B78332 (3) For most of human history, the phrase "light pollution" would have made no sense. Imagine walking toward London on a moonlit night around 1800, when it was Earth's largest city. Nearly ほとんど a million people lived there with candles, torches, and lanterns. Only a few houses were lit by gas, and there would be no public gaslights in the streets or squares for another seven years. From 広島 (前) さらに a few miles away, you would have been as likely to smell London as to see its faint collective glow. 集まっている様子 (4) Now most humans live under domes of reflected light: of scattering rays from cities and suburbs with too much lighting, and from light-flooded highways and factories. Nearly all of nighttime Europe is a nebula of light, as is most of the United States and all of Japan. In the south Atlantic the glow from a single group of fishing boats squid fishermen attracting prey with 大西 high brightness lamps can be seen from space, burning brighter, in fact, than Buenos Aires or Rio de Janeiro. (5) We've lit up the night, forgetting that it is occupied by many different living species. The number of nocturnal mammal species alone is astonishing. Light is a powerful biological force,

1枚目の訳と問いの答えって合っていますか？💦

(2)What is happening in current fashion trends? 訳:現在のファッションの流行では何が 起こっているのか? The distinction between men and women is vanishing.

1枚目の訳と、問いの答えってあっていますか？💦

(2)What is happening in current fashion trends? 訳:現在のファッションの流行では何が 起こっているのか? The distinction between men and women is vanishing.

(8)ってどうして2じゃだめなんですか？ ただの完了形とbeenがはいったときのちがいがいまいちわかりません

) asleep. But outside factors can influence LIU (6) ( Among such factors are diet, stress and (7)( ) to light. Rhythms ✓ set by the body's internal clock naturally flow like tides of the ocean. For example, body temperature is lowest around 4 a.m. and highest around 7 p.m. ) in the evening than in the Occur Interestingly, more world records (8)( morning. And research has shown that many athletes perform best in the intern: afternoon or evening - near the peak of body temperature. influer tide (1) prepared preparing 3 are preparing 4 prepare intere predicta circadia rhythm biologic

この問題が分かりません 教えてください

5 Many philosophers have argued that nature has little or no [21] can give it. However, we have failed to place sufficient value on key biological resources. For example, though forests are richest in the tropics, these regions contain many of the poorest countries today. Often, the poverty of the local people is blamed for environmental destruction. However, the weakness of property rights in those countries is a more important, but overlooked, factor. Poor eople often do not care about forests, except as a means to gain immediate benefit. To address this, governments in such poor countries need to establish poor people's rights to the biological riches around them, letting them own and manage these natural areas. [22] surely recognize the benefits of maintaining their forests.

関西学院大学の英語の問題です。 定期テストの初見問題で出た問題なのですがBの(2)の線で引いた問題(空欄補充・画像1枚目の13行目の真ん中辺りにあるgeneration (2) generationの問題です。)の答えがなぜ(エ)afterなのかが分かりません。 どなたか教... 続きを読む

次の英文を読み、 下記の設問 (A~D) に答えなさい。 In the last few decades, people all over the world have been told that humankind is on the path to equality, and that globalization and new technologies will help us get there sooner) In reality, the twenty- first century might create the most unequal societies in history. Though globalization and the Internet bridge the gap between countries, they threaten to enlarge the gap between classes, and just as humankind seems about to achieve global unification, the species itself might divide into different biological types. Inequality goes back to the Stone Age. Thirty thousand years ago, hunter-gatherer tribes buried some members in grand graves filled with thousands of ivory beads, bracelets, jewels and art objects, while other members had to (7)settle for a mere hole in the ground. ( 1), ancient hunter-gatherer tribes were still more egalitarian* than any succeeding human society, because they had very little property. Property is a condition for long-term inequality. Following the Agricultural Revolution, property multiplied, and with it inequality. As humans gained ownership of land, animals, plants and tools, hierarchical** societies emerged, in which small elites monopolized wealth and power for generation (2) generation. Hierarchy, then, came to be recognized not just as the model, but also as the ideal. How can there be order without a clear hierarchy between elites and ordinary people, between men and women, or between parents and children? Authorities all over the world patiently explained that just as in the human body not all parts are equal, so also in human society equality will bring nothing (3) disorder. In the late modern era, however, equality became an ideal in almost all human societies. It was mainly due to the Industrial Revolution, which made the masses more important than ever before. Industrial economies relied on masses of common workers, (4) industrial armies relied on masses of common soldiers. Governments invested heavily in the health, education and welfare of the masses, because they needed millions of healthy workers to operate the production lines and millions of loyal soldiers to fight in the wars. with ti own no (3) of sup horizo partic again A. Consequently, the history of the twentieth century revolved around the ( 5 ) of inequality between classes, races and genders. Though the world of the year 2000 still had its share of hierarchies, it was かなり nevertheless a much more equal place than the world of 1900. In the first years of the twenty-first century people expected that the egalitarian process would continue and even speed up. In particular, they hoped that globalization would spread economic growth throughout the world, and that as a result people in India and Egypt would come to enjoy the same opportunities and privileges as people in Finland and Canada. An entire generation grew up on this hope. Now it seems that this hope might not be fulfilled. Globalization has certainly profited large portions of humanity, but there are signs of growing inequality both between and within societies. Some groups increasingly monopolize the fruits of globalization, while billions are left behind. Already today, the richest hundred people together own more than the poorest four billion. This could get (6) worse. The rise of Al (Artificial Intelligence) might eliminate the economic value and political power of most humans. At the same time, improvements in biotechnology might make it possible to translate economic inequality into biological inequality. Soon the super rich might be able to buy life itself. If new treatments for extending life and for upgrading physical and intellectual abilities prove to be expensive, a huge biological gap might open up between the rich and the poor. By 2100, the rich might be more talented, more creative and more intelligent than the less advantaged. Once a real gap in ability opens between the rich and the poor, it will become almost impossible to close it. If the rich use their superior abilities to enrich themselves further, and if more money can buy them more efficient bodies and brains, B B V

日本語訳をお願いしたいです！！お願いします

次の英文を読んで、設問に答えなさい。 Everybody wants to eat delicious and safe food. However, exposure to different cultures reveals 2 how people's attitudes towards food safety and taste are not all innate or biological. Assumptions and practices regarding the preparation and presentation of food highlight the influence of culture on what and how people eat. For example, in one culture, some kinds of fresh ingredients might be considered edible (a), that is, without any kind of preparation like washing, peeling or heating. Yet in another culture, the same foodstuff may require some kind of preparation before it can be eaten. It is often difficult for people from the same culture to view such activities and beliefs objectively, and so witnessing the food practices of other cultures can be surprising. Sashimi is a great example of this. While sashimi may be the result of several steps of preparation from cleaning and cutting, to a particular style of presentation - heating is not one of these steps. (2)Japanese consumers take it for granted Cultures, the conventional belief may be that real and fish require some sort of cooking, such as baking or frying, (3) in order (b) them to be considered edible. In these cultures, sashimi is not thought of as raw, delicious and safe to eat, but rather as uncooked, and therefore possibly unsafe to eat, regardless of how it may taste. Fresh chicken eggs are another raw foodstuff commonly eaten in Japan — as a topping for rice, or as a dipping sauce for sukiyaki, for example but most people in the UK or the USA believe that chicken eggs require some kind of heating before they are fit for human consumption. However, the ways in which people from other cultural backgrounds eat certain foods might be considered equally unconventional by many Japanese. For example, few Japanese would eat the skin of apples or grapes. In this case, the difference involved in the preparation of the food is not the use of heat, but the removal of part of the foodstuff. People in much of the world eat apples and grapes without peeling them. A European might think, What could be more healthy and delicious than picking an apple from the tree and eating it?' But this way of thinking is not shared by a large number of Japanese. (4) It is clear that different cultures have different conventions regarding the preparation of particular foods, and different beliefs about what is considered delicious. However, there is no question that some common food preparation practices - or sometimes a lack of certain food preparation processes - are unsafe from a scientific point of view. However delicious they may be, raw meat and fish can contain the eggs of harmful parasites like tapeworms, which are often undetectable. If chicken eggs are not properly stored, and are left unconsumed for a long time, they can easily produce bacteria like salmonella. The poisoning caused by salmonella does not usually require hospitalization, but it can be very dangerous for young children and elderly people. In addition, while eating the skin of apples and grapes may be a good source of dietary fiber, one also runs the risk of consuming insecticides, the poisons that are used to protect many non-organically farmed fruits from insects. So, while there may be 'no accounting for taste' beyond culture, safety is a different issue, and (5) we should always be aware of the risks involved with culturally accepted methods of food production and consumption. 問1 下線部 (1)で,空欄 ( a )に入る最も適切な語句を, (A)~(D)から選び, 記号で答えなさい。 (A) as is clear (B) as is fresh (C) as they are (D) as unclean 問2 問3 問4 問5 下線部(2)を日本語に訳しなさい。 下線部 (3)の空欄(b)に入る語(1語) を書きなさい。 下線部(4) を日本語に訳しなさい。 下線部 (5)の理由として最も適切なものを, (A)~(D) から選び,記号で答えなさい。 (A) Eating raw chicken eggs or unpeeled fruits can be dangerous in certain conditions because of harmful bacteria or pesticides. (B) Eating unpeeled apples or grapes may cause weight gain. (C) Only young children and elderly people are vulnerable to particular bacteria. (D) Beliefs about what is considered delicious actually come from better understanding of food preparation. 問6 本文の内容と一致するものを, (A)~(G)から3つ選び,記号で答えなさい。 (A) By food preparation processes, the author exclusively means the use of heat. (B) Culturally established ways of consuming food may conflict with scientific principles of food safety. (C) In some food cultures outside Japan, fish in its raw state is not categorized as an edible foodstuff. (D) People having little contact with other cultures tend to view their own food-related conventions as natural and standard. (E) Repeated exercise is required for the mastery of any food preparation. (F) Instinct alone determines what and how people eat. (G) All cultures around the world consider it natural to eat unpeeled fruit.