学年

教科

質問の種類

TOEIC・英語 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

テストの過去問に解答がなく、答えがわからないので英語得意な方教えていただきたいです🤲明日がテストなので早めに解答をいただけるとありがたいです🙇‍♀️

Ⅱ 次の英文を読み, 問に答えよ。 2.2.2. Consumer test それぞれ異なる容量の1つのキューブ (10) Consumers were recruited among workers from the Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimen- tos, Valencia, Spain. Thirty persons, 22-60 years old, approximately half female, half male, who consumed apples frequently, were used for the study. Consumers received one cube from each different storage time fol-following lowing a balanced complete block experimental design. For each sample they had to score global acceptability of the product using a nine-box) scale labeled on the left with “dislike very much', in the middle with indiffer- ent" and on the right with "like very much". They also answered the question “Would you normally consume this product?" with a yes or a no (Hough et al., 2003; Gámbaro et al., 2004a,b). ロロロ B 問1. 本文中に記載されている試験方法は, 何を何するかどうかを問うものである。 "( A ) ( )する場合の試験” と答える場合に, (A) と(B)に当てはまる単語を英語で答えよ。 問2. 何人のパネルに試験しているのかを答えよ。 問3.ここで示されている食品の官能評価法をもっとパネルが評価しやすく回答しやす いようにするには, どうしたらよいか答えよ。 問4. パネルの男女比はどの程度であると述べているか答えよ。 5. この英文に書かれている内容に沿った官能評価シートを作成せよ。 以上

回答募集中 回答数: 0
TOEIC・英語 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

英語の問題です。 教えて欲しいです🙇‍♀️

(2) I had my teeth 1 check 1( )に入る最も適切な語句を ① ~ ④から選びなさい。 (1) He went on speaking as if she ( 1 can't 2 hasn't ) there. Son 3 wouldn't ) by a dentist this morning. ult niles 3 checking wahiwon (青山学院大 ) ④weren't pomibinand (岩手医科大) 24 to check 2 checked (3) You should not keep any pets ( 1 after 2 unless ) you can take good care of them. 3 when (中央大) ④which 1 as 2 in ) all be correct. ②anytime (6) If the weather ( ①must have been (4) This town will change ( ) another ten years. (5) Those may not ( 1 absolute ) fine yesterday, I would have done the laundry. 2 is (7) Studying takes up a lot of my time during the week, ( ) little time for hobbies. (芝浦工業大) since 3 of (國學院大) 3 everything ④necessarily (関西学院大 ) ③ wasn't 4 had been (皇學館大) ①1 has left (8) Have you heard the rumors ( 1 that 2 what leaves leaving 4 left ) Susan has returned to this town? ③ which (麗澤大) ④ who 1 by (9) What was found in this experiment is ( 2 for (10)( ) what to say, she remained silent. ) great importance to researchers. 3 in (立命館大) 4 of (愛知工業大) 1 Not knowing 2 Being not knowing ③No knowing ④Knowing no (11) I tried to ( 1 have 2 make ) her to tell me what happened last night. 3 get (十文字学園女子大) 4 let How gimon and (12) Do what you like, as ( 1 far 2 much B in 1 in 2 with bnat am ) as you leave me alone. 3 long (13) This tool is dangerous. Please read the instructions ( (14) If I hadn't drunk so much last night, I ( 1 feel (15) I wish you 1 attend (16) If I ( 1 were ) 2 will feel ) the party yesterday. 2 were attending ) much better than I do right now. ③ would feel ③ have attended (中京大) 4 would have felt (目白大) ④had attended ) in your situation, I would be more careful about what you post on social media. (フェリス女学院大) 4 many ) care. (聖隷クリストファー大) at ④take gwol 3 will be (南山大) ④would be

回答募集中 回答数: 0
化学 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

はじめまして。 問2.3がわからなくてとても困っています。 もしよろしければ教えていただきたいです。 よろしくお願いします。

<問題> 1) 安息香酸、クロロフェノール、アントラニル酸メチルのpK』 をPubChem で調査せよ。 2) 二つの化学種が平衡状態にあるとき、 Gibbs 自由エネルギー差はAG =-RT In K で表 される。 ここでKは平衡定数 (ある化学種に占めるもう一方に化学種の割合) である。 メチルシクロヘキサンのメチル基がアキシアルを占める立体配座とエクアトリアルを 占める立体配座の標準状態における存在比を求めよ。 計算実験で得られた立体配座異 性体のエネルギーの差を Gibbs 自由エネルギー差の近似値として用いてよい。 なお、In (エルエヌ) は自然対数を指しInx = yならばey=x (左辺はexp (y) と書くこともある) である。 気体定数は R ≒ 8.31 JK-1 mol-1 を用いよ (Bruice 有機化学、 5.7 参照)。 3) メタン、エチレン、アセチレンの分子軌道を量子化学計算の一種であるハートリー・ フォック法により計算せよ。 Engine: Gamess, Calculation: Molecular Orbitals, Theory: RHF, Basis Set: Minimal:STO-3G を指定せよ。 各化合物はそれぞれいくつの 分子軌道をもつか。 上記のうち、 多重結合を有する化合物について、 全ての軌道を 図示し占有数(Occupancy) を示せ。 また、 それぞれの化合物の結合角(∠HCH やく HCC) はおよそ何度か。 これまでに学習した軌道の混成状態についての知識と比較せ よ。

回答募集中 回答数: 0
TOEIC・英語 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

下線部(1)の文構造が分かりません。特に2行目の文構造が分かりません。強調のdoであることは分かりますが、その後のthat以降が関係詞?かすらも分からないので、誰か教えて下さい!

次の英文は1991年に出版された本からのもので、 研究分野としての「人工知 能」 (Artificial Intelligence) について述べています。 下線部(1)~(3)を日本語に訳 しなさい。 What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Just about the only characterization of Al that would meet with universal acceptance is that it involves trying to make machines do tasks which are normally seen as requiring intelligence. There are countless refinements of this characterization: what sort of machines we want to consider; how we decide what tasks require intelligence and so on. One of the most important questions concerns the reasons why we want to make machines do such tasks. AI has always been split between people who want to make machines do tasks that require intelligence because they want more useful machines, and people who want to do it because they see it as a way of exploring how humans do such tasks. We will call the two approaches the engineering approach and the cognitive-science respectively. (2) (1) approach The techniques required for the two approaches are not always very different. For many of the tasks that engineering AI wants solutions to, the only systems we know about that can perform them are humans), so that, at least initially, the obvious way to design solutions is to try to mimic what we know about humans. For many of the tasks that cognitive-science Al wants solutions to, the evidence on how humans do them is too hard to interpret to enable us to construct computational models, so the only approach is to try to design solutions from scratch" and then see how well they fit what we know about humans. The main visible difference between the two approaches is in (3) their criteria for success; an engineer would be delighted to have create something that outperformed a person; a cognitive scientist would regard it as a failure. -1- M7 (492-61

未解決 回答数: 1
1/15