Question

みみ

31行のitは何を指していますか？itがthingを指しているのかとも思ったのですがそれだとundurstandの後に名詞の穴ができてしまっておかしいのではないかと思いました。教えて頂きたいです。

25
out of twenty native Alaskan languages,
冬の最
Although language extinction is sad for the people involved, why should the rest of
us care? What effect will other people's language loss have on the future of people who
(A):
speak English, for example? Replacing a minor language with a more widespread
・ゆる可能
124) = permit
.
20 one may even seem like a good thing, allowing people to communicate with each other
more easily. But language diversity is as important as biological diversity.
といい
hot all
~70%
Andrew Woodfield, director of the Centre for Theories of Language and Learning 1-14
in Bristol, England, suggested in a 1995 seminar on language conservation that people
do not yet know all the ways in which linguistic diversity is important. "The fact is, no
one knows exactly what riches are hidden inside the less-studied languages," he says.
Woodfield compares one argument for conserving unstudied endangered plants -
that they may be medically valuable with the argument for conserving endangered
languages. We have inductive evidence based on past studies of well-known danguages
that there will be riches, even though we do not know what they will be
単語
をだすことが
It seems
(B)
30 paradoxical but it's true. By allowing.languages to die out, the human race is destroying
便
4714
things doesn't understand," he argues.
(243)
Stephen Wurm, in his introduction to the Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger
1-1

Answer 1

✨ 最佳解答 ✨

ののののの

the human raceじゃないですかね。
人間というものを、人格を持つ"ひと"というよりは
生物的な"種"みたいな言い方をしてるわけですよね。
動物の一種としてのヒトというか

動物も飼い犬飼い猫みたいに飼い主の感情が投影されたりするとheとかsheとか言ったりしますが、
基本的にはitなので、そう考えればthe human raceもモノ扱いできるかなと

それであれば it doesn't "understand"っていう、人間が主語にしかならないような動詞（=認識の動詞）が使われてても問題ないですよね。