学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

線を引いたところの訳し方を丁寧に教えて頂きたいです🙇‍♀️

L American poet Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, "Every artist was first an amateur." He likely never thought those words would apply to machines. Yet artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated a growing talent for creativity, whether writing a heavy-metal rock album or producing an original portrait that is strikingly similar to a Rembrandt. Applying AI to the art world might seem unoriginal; there are, of course, plenty of humans delivering awe-inspiring work. Supporters say, however, the real beauty of training AI to be creative does not lie in the end product-but rather in the technology's potential to expand on its own machine-learning education, and to solve problems by thinking in different ways far faster and better than humans can. For example, creative problem-solving AI could someday make snap decisions that save the lives of the passengers in a self-driving car if its sensors fail. AI with a creative component will be essential in developing highly automated systems that can respond appropriately to human life, says Mark Riedl, an associate professor at Georgia Institute of Technology's School of Interactive Computing. "The fact is, we do lots of little bits of creativity every single day; lots of problem-solving goes on," Riedl says. "If my son gets a toy stuck under the couch, I have to devise a tool from a hanger to get it out." Riedl points out human creativity is also important in human social interactions, even telling a well-timed joke or recognizing a pun. Computers struggle with such subtleties. An incomplete understanding of how humans construct metaphors, for example, was all it took for an experiment in Al-generated literature to compose a new Harry Potter chapter filled with nonsensical sentences such as, "The floor of the castle seemed like a large pile

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

投げやりです。すいません。英語皆無なので代行してください。

【必答問題 5 日常使う物のデザインをする際には標準化 (standardization) という方法がある。 という内容に続く次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点44) If we examine the history of advances in all technological fields, we see that some improvements come naturally through the technology itself, while others come through standardization. The early history of the automobile is a good example. The first cars were very difficult to operate. They required strength and skill beyond the abilities of many. Some problems were solved through automation. Other aspects of cars and driving were standardized through the long process of international standards committees: . On which side of the road to drive (constant within countries) country, but variable across On which side f the car the driver sits (depends upon which side of the road the car is driven) -The (2) of essential components: steering wheel, brake, clutch, and accelerator (the same, whether on the left- or right-hand side of the car) Standardization is one type of cultural constraint. With standardization, once you have learned to drive one car, you feel confident that you can drive any car, anyplace in the world. Standardization provides a major breakthrough in usability. I have enough friends on national and international standards committees to realize that the process f determining an internationally accepted standard is laborious. Even when all members agree on the merits of standardization, the task of selecting standards becomes a long, political issue. A small company can standardize its products without too much difficulty, but it is much more difficult for an industrial, national, or international body to agree to standards. There even exists a standardized procedure for establishing national and international standards. organizations works on standards. First, a set of national and international Then when a new standard is proposed, it must work its way through each organization's approval process. Standards are usually the result of a *compromise among the various competing positions, which can often be an inferior compromise. Sometimes the answer is to agree on (4 ). Look at the existence I both metric and *English units; of left-hand- and 18 right-hand-drive automobiles. There are several international standards for the *voltages and *frequencies of electricity, and several different kinds of electrical plugs and sockets- which cannot interchanged. With all these difficulties and with the continual advances in technology, are standards really necessary? Yes, they are. Take the everyday, clock. It's standardized. Consider how much trouble you would have telling time with a backward clock, where the hands revolved "counterclockwise." A few such clocks exist, primarily as humorous conversation pieces. When a clock truly violates standards, such as (the one in Figure 1, it is difficult to determine what time is being displayed. Why? The logic behind the time display is identical to that of conventional clocks: there are only two differences - the hands move in the opposite direction (counterclockwise) and the location of "12," usually at the top, has been moved. This clock is just as logical as the standard one. It. bothers us because we have standardized on a different scheme, on the very definition of the term clockwise. Without such standardization, clock reading would be more difficult: you'd always have to figure out the "mapping. E) compromise *metric メートル法の *English units イギリスの計量法(ヤードボンド法) *frequencies of electricity 電気の周波数 voltages E *mapping 対応づけ (2つのものの間の関係を意味する専門用語) 問1 下線部(1)の内容を、 同じ段落の自動車の例に基づいて30字以内の日本語で答えよ。た だし、句読点も字数に数える。 問2 本文中の空所 (2) に入る語として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ 選び 記号で答えよ。 7 color イ location ウ price I sight (239) 問3 第2パラグラフ (Standardization is one type of ...) について 次の Question に対す る Answer となるように、空所に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エのうちから一 つ選び、 記号で答えよ。 Question: What is "a major breakthrough in usability" provided by standardization? Answer Because of standardization, you ( device of the same kind all over the world. 7 can apply what you have learned to イ can make cannot produce I cannot use what you have learned when using 問7 下線部(5)が表す図 (Figure 1)として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選 び記号で答えよ。 11 12 1 12 ) any machine or 10 2 10% 9 3 1 5 6 問4 下線部(3)の示す内容を, 40字程度の日本語で答えよ。 ただし, 句読点も字数に数える。 ウ 11 6 1 問5 次の文を第3パラグラフ (Ihave enough friends...) に入れるとき,本文中の①~ のうちのどの位置に入れるのが最も適当か、 次のア~エのうちから一つ選び, 記号 で答えよ。 9 3 Each step is complex, for if there are three ways of doing something, then there are sure to be strong proponents of each of the three ways, plus people who will argue that it is too early to standardize. 70 問8 最終パラグラフ (With all these difficulties...) の内容をもとに, 次の Question に2 語程度の英語一文で答えよ。 Question: According to the writer, why is the standardization of the everyday clo necessary? イ 2 ウ H O 問6 本文中の空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選び 記号で答えよ。 7 a single standard 1 several different standards ウ the same standard I too few standards <<-20-> <-21->

回答募集中 回答数: 0
TOEIC・英語 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

下線部(1)の文構造が分かりません。特に2行目の文構造が分かりません。強調のdoであることは分かりますが、その後のthat以降が関係詞?かすらも分からないので、誰か教えて下さい!

次の英文は1991年に出版された本からのもので、 研究分野としての「人工知 能」 (Artificial Intelligence) について述べています。 下線部(1)~(3)を日本語に訳 しなさい。 What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Just about the only characterization of Al that would meet with universal acceptance is that it involves trying to make machines do tasks which are normally seen as requiring intelligence. There are countless refinements of this characterization: what sort of machines we want to consider; how we decide what tasks require intelligence and so on. One of the most important questions concerns the reasons why we want to make machines do such tasks. AI has always been split between people who want to make machines do tasks that require intelligence because they want more useful machines, and people who want to do it because they see it as a way of exploring how humans do such tasks. We will call the two approaches the engineering approach and the cognitive-science respectively. (2) (1) approach The techniques required for the two approaches are not always very different. For many of the tasks that engineering AI wants solutions to, the only systems we know about that can perform them are humans), so that, at least initially, the obvious way to design solutions is to try to mimic what we know about humans. For many of the tasks that cognitive-science Al wants solutions to, the evidence on how humans do them is too hard to interpret to enable us to construct computational models, so the only approach is to try to design solutions from scratch" and then see how well they fit what we know about humans. The main visible difference between the two approaches is in (3) their criteria for success; an engineer would be delighted to have create something that outperformed a person; a cognitive scientist would regard it as a failure. -1- M7 (492-61

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

論表のワークです!お願いします🙏🏻 ̖́-

Lesson 4 Esports' Time Has apniwellot er /50 A Translate the English into Japanese and the Japanese into English. 【語彙の知識】(各1点) 1. various 形 B1 [ ] 2. 名 B1 戦闘, 対戦 3. respond B1 ] 4. strategy 名 A2 [ 5. 名 A2 社会, 世間 6. 名 A2 基本, 原理 ] B Choose the word whose underlined part is pronounced differently from the other three 【発音の知識】 (2点) 1. 7. basic イ. battle ウ. practice I. strategy 2. ア. another イ. gold 7. over I. program 3. ア. electronic 1. popular ウ. respond I. society C Complete the following English sentences to match the Japanese. 【表現と文法の知識】 1. そのテニスの試合は4月30日に開催されます。 The tennis tournament will ( 2. 私は美術や音楽のような芸術系の教科が好きです。 I like artistic subjects ( ) ( 3. 近頃, ますます多くの人が東京を訪れている。 ) and ( ) ( ) on April 30. ) art and music. (各3点) 1) people are visiting Tokyo these days. D Arrange the words in the proper order to match the Japanese. 【表現と文法の知識・技能】 Arranga. 1. プロ野球選手になるのは有名な歌手になるのと同じくらい難しい。 (各3点) Becoming a professional baseball player (as/as/becoming / difficult / is a famous singer. 2. 私にこの機械の使い方を教えてください。 Please (teach/use/to/me/how) this machine. 3. 私の試験の結果は彼女ほどはよくなかった。 My exam results (as/as/good/hers / weren't).

回答募集中 回答数: 0
1/26