学年

質問の種類

TOEIC・英語 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

この問題全ての解答教えて欲しいです!丸付いてるのは気にしないでください!

Let's Try! Part 5 空所に当てはまる選択肢を選びましょう。 1. We CheckLink ------- that gold is a sounder investment than stock or bonds due to the current currency crisis. (A) require (B) deliver (C) believe (D) press 2. Pacifico Company's new business plan looks like it will have a their revenue. (A) retiring (B) relative (C) collaborative (D) positive influence on 3. The noise of the construction in the warehouse was so loud that the client had to ------- himself three times before he could be heard. (A) recall (B) repeat (C) write (D) register tuo 4. The job which we had asked the technician to do was not done to our total -- (A) satisfaction (B) restoration (C) feedback (D) reference ------- to do in one operation. 5. The medical procedure used by the surgical team is too (A) sufficient (B) real (C) perfect (D) complex 6. It is imperative that the ------- be delivered before our client arrives at the office around noon. Too (A) package (B) manufacturer (C) mailman (D) currency aldesing (A) 7. The newly hired employee seems (A) previously (B) expensively capable of meeting our work expectations. (C) entirely (D) contrastively 8. The scientist's theory has been thoroughly tested and ------- to be reliable by many independent laboratories. (A) studied (B) proven (C) dedicated (D) combined (8) Frogs (A) aften med and

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

投げやりです。すいません。英語皆無なので代行してください。

【必答問題 5 日常使う物のデザインをする際には標準化 (standardization) という方法がある。 という内容に続く次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点44) If we examine the history of advances in all technological fields, we see that some improvements come naturally through the technology itself, while others come through standardization. The early history of the automobile is a good example. The first cars were very difficult to operate. They required strength and skill beyond the abilities of many. Some problems were solved through automation. Other aspects of cars and driving were standardized through the long process of international standards committees: . On which side of the road to drive (constant within countries) country, but variable across On which side f the car the driver sits (depends upon which side of the road the car is driven) -The (2) of essential components: steering wheel, brake, clutch, and accelerator (the same, whether on the left- or right-hand side of the car) Standardization is one type of cultural constraint. With standardization, once you have learned to drive one car, you feel confident that you can drive any car, anyplace in the world. Standardization provides a major breakthrough in usability. I have enough friends on national and international standards committees to realize that the process f determining an internationally accepted standard is laborious. Even when all members agree on the merits of standardization, the task of selecting standards becomes a long, political issue. A small company can standardize its products without too much difficulty, but it is much more difficult for an industrial, national, or international body to agree to standards. There even exists a standardized procedure for establishing national and international standards. organizations works on standards. First, a set of national and international Then when a new standard is proposed, it must work its way through each organization's approval process. Standards are usually the result of a *compromise among the various competing positions, which can often be an inferior compromise. Sometimes the answer is to agree on (4 ). Look at the existence I both metric and *English units; of left-hand- and 18 right-hand-drive automobiles. There are several international standards for the *voltages and *frequencies of electricity, and several different kinds of electrical plugs and sockets- which cannot interchanged. With all these difficulties and with the continual advances in technology, are standards really necessary? Yes, they are. Take the everyday, clock. It's standardized. Consider how much trouble you would have telling time with a backward clock, where the hands revolved "counterclockwise." A few such clocks exist, primarily as humorous conversation pieces. When a clock truly violates standards, such as (the one in Figure 1, it is difficult to determine what time is being displayed. Why? The logic behind the time display is identical to that of conventional clocks: there are only two differences - the hands move in the opposite direction (counterclockwise) and the location of "12," usually at the top, has been moved. This clock is just as logical as the standard one. It. bothers us because we have standardized on a different scheme, on the very definition of the term clockwise. Without such standardization, clock reading would be more difficult: you'd always have to figure out the "mapping. E) compromise *metric メートル法の *English units イギリスの計量法(ヤードボンド法) *frequencies of electricity 電気の周波数 voltages E *mapping 対応づけ (2つのものの間の関係を意味する専門用語) 問1 下線部(1)の内容を、 同じ段落の自動車の例に基づいて30字以内の日本語で答えよ。た だし、句読点も字数に数える。 問2 本文中の空所 (2) に入る語として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ 選び 記号で答えよ。 7 color イ location ウ price I sight (239) 問3 第2パラグラフ (Standardization is one type of ...) について 次の Question に対す る Answer となるように、空所に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エのうちから一 つ選び、 記号で答えよ。 Question: What is "a major breakthrough in usability" provided by standardization? Answer Because of standardization, you ( device of the same kind all over the world. 7 can apply what you have learned to イ can make cannot produce I cannot use what you have learned when using 問7 下線部(5)が表す図 (Figure 1)として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選 び記号で答えよ。 11 12 1 12 ) any machine or 10 2 10% 9 3 1 5 6 問4 下線部(3)の示す内容を, 40字程度の日本語で答えよ。 ただし, 句読点も字数に数える。 ウ 11 6 1 問5 次の文を第3パラグラフ (Ihave enough friends...) に入れるとき,本文中の①~ のうちのどの位置に入れるのが最も適当か、 次のア~エのうちから一つ選び, 記号 で答えよ。 9 3 Each step is complex, for if there are three ways of doing something, then there are sure to be strong proponents of each of the three ways, plus people who will argue that it is too early to standardize. 70 問8 最終パラグラフ (With all these difficulties...) の内容をもとに, 次の Question に2 語程度の英語一文で答えよ。 Question: According to the writer, why is the standardization of the everyday clo necessary? イ 2 ウ H O 問6 本文中の空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選び 記号で答えよ。 7 a single standard 1 several different standards ウ the same standard I too few standards <<-20-> <-21->

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

(4)について This is why にしてしまいました。  This is becauseというようなThis is whyの表現ではだめな理由を教えてください

(60分) Ⅰ 次の英文を読んで、下の設問 (1)~ (11) の語には注が付いています。 に答えなさい。 なお、 Food is fuel. When your body needs energy, you eat. When it doesn't you don't. It should be so simple when you think about it, but that's exactly the problem: us big smart humans can and do think about it, (, introduces all manner of problems and neuroses*. Have you noticed how you always have "room for dessert"? You might have just eaten the best part of a cow, or enough cheesy pasta to sink a gondola, but you can manage that fudge brownie or sundae. Why? How? If your stomach is full, how ice cream triple-scoop b) eating more even physically possible? It's largely because your brain makes an executive decision and decides that, no, you still have room. The sweetness of desserts is a palpable* reward (7)that the brain recognizes and wants so it overrules the stomach. C Exactly {c case is ③ is 4 the this why) uncertain. It may be that humans need quite a complex diet in order to remain in tip-top* condition, so rather than just relying on our basic metabolic systems to eat whatever is available, the brain steps in and tries to regulate our diet better. And this would be fine if that was all the brain does. But it doesn't. So it isn't. Learned associations are incredibly powerful when it comes ( d ) eating. You may be a big fan of something like, say, cake. You can be eating cake for years without any bother, then one day you eat some cake that makes you vomit. Could be some of the cream in it has gone sour; it might contain an ingredient you're allergic to; or (and here's the annoying one) it could be that something else entirely made you throw up shortly after eating cake. out of The disgust eating poiso g And it consider th The brain than food, it doesn't worryingl needlessl one of li shovelin the brai (注) (1) (2

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

写真の文章の赤線部についてですが、 このitは何かの指示語でしょうか?(もし指示語だとしたら、写真の中のあると思います…)この参考書にはsvocが振られていて仮主語だった場合には仮sという書き方が毎回されているのですが、今回itにはsしか振られていないので、何かの指示語?と... 続きを読む

3 1 (Given this), why does this matter (to you)? 2 Why might you need to S V S 段落冒頭の疑問文テーマの提示 S depart (from 〈the way 「you currently perceive]〉)? (After all), it feels like we see reality (accurately), (at least most of the time). * (Clearly) our brain's 4 S s-v model of perception has served our species (well), (allowing us to (successfully) survive (in the world and its ever-shifting complexity), (from 0 3 具体例 our days [as hunter-gatherers] to our current existence [paying bills on our smartphones])). 5 We are able to find food and shelter, hold down a job, and V1 6 build meaningful relationships. We have built cities, launched astronauts V3 0 0 (into space) , and created the Internet. We must be doing something [right], "; O so who cares <that we don't see reality>? O 段落末の疑問文 → 反語 V2' 訳 このことを踏まえたうえで, どうしてこれがあなたにとって重要なことなのだろ うか?どうして、 現在の知覚方法から離れる必要があるかもしれないのだろうか。 とい うのも少なくともたいていの場合, 私たちは現実を正確に見ているように思えるのだ。 私たちの脳の知覚様式は間違いなく私たちの種に役立ってきたし、そのおかげで私たち は、狩猟採集民の時代からスマートフォンで支払いを行う現代の我々にいたるまで、世界 とその絶え間なく変化し続ける複雑さの中で生き残ることに成功してきた。 私たちは食 糧や住みかを見つけ, 安定した仕事に就き、有意義な関係性を築くことができる。 私たち は都市を築き, 宇宙飛行士を宇宙に送り出し, インターネットを作り出した。 私たちは正 しいことをしているに違いない。だから,私たちに現実が見えていないことなんてどうで もいいのだ。

未解決 回答数: 1
1/6