学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

36,37,38の答えが分かりません。 どなたか教えていただけませんか?

asked strange questions so that the answers would sound funny and make them smile. that answer was true or not. Later in the interview, the volunteers were deliberately In the study, the scientists conducted interviews with volunteers. The volunteers recent study by scientists at the University of Portsmouth has shown that people can When people communicate face to face, they do not just communicate by speaking language. There are other factors involved, such as gestures. If the person you are tell if a speaker is smiling or not even without seeing their face but just by listening were asked to answer all questions with “I do in the summer,” regardless of whether talking to frowns, you know that he or she is unhappy. Whena person laughs during a conversation, you can tell that that person thought something was funny. However, a The interviews were videotaped with the purpose of gathering samples of different C 35) Smiling from Ear to Ear to their voice. of smiles. The scientists then analyzed the smiles. types According to the scientists, there are as many as 50 different kinds of smiles. T he researchers then had different group of volunteers listen to the audio portion of the recordings. This group of volunteers could tell what kind of smile the speaker had on his or her face by just hearing their voice. This indicated to the scientists that the voice has characteristics that communicate feelings and that people can interpret them. Another study also suggests that customer satisfaction is closely related to friendliness. As we all know, the best way to show friendliness is to smile. Researchers think that using the smiling voices in products or services effectively, Such as answering systems and computer programs, can contribute to better customer service. This can also be applied to hiring and training staff. Since people can tell ifa smile is real or not by a person's facial expression, and it has been proven that people, for example, customers can tell if a staff member's smile is real or not just by listening, then smiling not only from the bottom of your heart, but with your voice may be a g0od way to improve business.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

下線部3は具体的にどのようなことを表しているか という問題です。 教えてください🙇‍♀️

第1講 次の英文を読んで以下の設間に答えよ。 It happened80 alowly that we didn't notice, A friend who hadn't seon the family for a while eame round and pointed out the truth, "Wow, Dodi's got sO fat! He will die of obesity ifhe ( 1A ) eating in this way," Once it had been said, we had to agree, If you lookod at Dodi from behind S When he was sitting down, you could see how big his thirteen-year-old middle and hips had grown、 He had become quite lazy, too, He ( 1B ) to relax in front of the fire rather than play in the garden as he had before. His extra weight was slowing him down. He ( 1C ) to eat anything except a particular brand of cat meal for a very 10 long timeuntil my friend visited us, The label said, “Guaranteed real tuna!" In fact, there was ( 2 ) tuna, 10% according to the small print. It was made largely from chicken parts, such as necks and feet, and also contained corn, vegetable oil, and sugar. Dodi is our cat and we know that cats do not eat sugar, corn, or vegetable 15 oil in normal circumstances. Nevertheless, that's what we had been feeding him, It said on the packets that it was “scientifically prepared,” but now we realize it was prepared economically. While there are good reasons for pets to eat waste from human food production, ,it is unwise to feed them types of waste they would never naturally eat, and which actually make them fat and tob avn 20 unhealthy. In the case of Dodi, who had become used to the flavors added by the food scientists, it was ( 5 ) necessary to persuade him to eat healthier cat food. 表公華 文の Ved こ 人 な さ - 第1講

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0