学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

この教科書のレベルはどのくらいですか教えください この教科書でどのくらいのレベルの大学まで対応できますか?

1 On 10 February 2009, at a height of about 800 kilometers above Siberia, an American satellite collided the first such height [háit] satellite [séetalait] collide(d) [kaláid(id)] with an old Russian satellite. It was collision [kaligan] collision in the history of space development. As a result, fragment(s) [fráegmant(s)) debris [dabri:] more than 1,000 fragments of debris were scattered into space. 2 The image above shows the vast amount of space debris in orbit around Earth. Approximately 22,000 vast [váest] orbit [5:rbat] approximately [aprá:ksamatli) objects larger than 10 centimeters across are floating around Earth. Of these, about 16,000 are from known 10 considering [kansidarig) artificial [a:rtafijal] currently [ks:rantli] operation [a:paréifon] Considering that there are only about 1,000 artificial satellites currently in operation, the amount of Sources. space debris is astonishing. This space debris is not only due to the collision of satellites. For example, when rockets reach space, they s 15 leave behind surplus engines and fuel tanks. These objects remain in orbit as space debris. In addition, surplus s5:rplas] there are tools that astronauts have dropped while tool(s) [t:l(z)) astronaut(s) [astrand:t(s) aluminum [ala:manom per|par] working outside. Even a one-centimeter aluminum ball. when orbiting at a speed of around 10 kilometers per 0 bullet [bálat] second, is far more powerful than a bullet from a gun. gun [gán]

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

このページの日本語訳を教えて欲しいです! 時間がないので、早めにお願いしたいです!ごめんなさい!

THE SECRET TO GOOD MEMORY There is a saying in English, "In one ear and out the other." It means we hear something, and we forget it quickly. Is it true? 1 In 1895, a doctor(named Hermann Ebbinghaus)researched the question, “How quickly do people forget new information?" He found that people forget new information very quickly] Within an hour, a person forgets about 55%. Within 24 hours, a person forgets about 70%. 2 人はとれたた We do not forget all information that quickly. If you(burn, yourself on a kitchen stove, you will remember to be careful for á long time. That's because you were in danger. In the classroom, you are not in danger. In the classroom, it is easy to forget your learning. 3 How can you remember more?_You need to fepeat what you learned many timesARepetition is the secret. Language teachers say it takes at least 20 different repetitions to learn a word in a different language! This does not mean 20 repetitions in one hour. Learning requires repetition over days, weeks, and months.. 4 Why not 20 repetitions in an hour? When you repeat the same information again and again, the information stays in your short-term memory?. The information is easy to find, but it does not stay in short-term memory for long. 5 1curve: a line in a graph 2 short-term memory: the type of memory that stores information temporarily, e.g., while repeating a phone number

回答募集中 回答数: 0