Ens3101 III
29
5262
7
ขออภัยในความรก เลอะเทอะด้วยค่ะ😊😊
แนวข้อสอบอยู่หน้าสุดท้าย
ปล.เรียนย้อนหลังจาก1/61
ความคิดเห็น
ล็อกอินเพื่อแสดงความคิดเห็นผลการค้นหาอื่น ๆ
สมุดโน้ตแนะนำ
คำถามที่เกี่ยวข้องกับโน้ตสรุปนี้
News
29
5262
7
ขออภัยในความรก เลอะเทอะด้วยค่ะ😊😊
แนวข้อสอบอยู่หน้าสุดท้าย
ปล.เรียนย้อนหลังจาก1/61
เขียนtopic***ข้อความcopyจากอินเทอร์เน็ต มีขาด-เกิน
How was the moon formed
There are three theories
Giant impact hypothesis
the giant impact hypothesis suggests that the moon formed when an object smashed into early Earth. Like the other planets, Earth formed from the leftover cloud of dust and gas orbiting the young sun
Co-formation theory
Moons can also form at the same time as their parent planet. Under such an explanation, gravity would have caused material in the early solar system to draw together at the same time as gravity bound particles together to form Earth. Such a moon would have a composition to the planet, and would explain the moon's present location
Capture theory
Perhaps Earth's gravity snagged a passing body, as happened with other moons in the solar system, such as the Martian moons of Phobos and Deimos
Under the capture theory, a rocky body formed elsewhere in the solar system could have been drawn into orbit around Earth. The capture theory would explain the differences in the composition of Earth and its moon. However, such orbiters are often oddly shaped, rather than being spherical bodies like the moon. Their paths don't tend to line up with the ecliptic of their parent planet, also unlike the moon.
Although the co-formation theory and the capture theory both explain some elements of the existence of the moon, they leave many questions unanswered. At present, the giant impact hypothesis seems to cover many of these questions, making it the best model to fit the scientific evidence for how the moon was created
เติมคำ10คำ
ตอบคำถาม10ข้อ
เขียนcause-effect
3ข้อ