学年

質問の種類

英語 中学生

問4の並び替えはどのように考えて解けばいいのですか?

3 次は、高校生のHayato (男性) が書いた文章です。 これを読んで, 間 1~ 問6に答えなさい。 *印の ついている語句には、本文のあとに〔注〕があります。(34点) I love bicycles. I've been using my bicycle since I was a junior high school student. One morning, however, I got scared on my way to school. A car passed me really fast. It almost touched my bicycle. There are only a few *bicycle lanes in my town, and I think some of those lanes are too narrow for a bicycle to use safely. I wanted to make our streets safer for cyclists, and then I read about "Copenhagen, Denmark in a bicycle "magazine. It's Aas one of the most *bicycle-friendly cities in the world. I learned more about the city on the Internet and thought it's really a wonderful city for cyclists. I'd like to write about it. In Denmark. 90% of the people have a bicycle, and in Copenhagen, 49% of the workers and students go to work or school by bicycle (27 % go by car, 18% by bus or train, and 6% on foot). Many streets in the city have bicycle lanes and bicycle traffic lights, and there is even a bicycle bridge named "The Bicycle "Snake." I was "envious of the cyclists in Copenhagen because the city is bicycle-friendly in every way. You can ride a bicycle at 20 km/h without B at red lights even when the traffic is busy, and you can bring your bicycle on trains and buses. In the 2019 ranking of "Bicycle-friendly Cities," Copenhagen was No. 1 and Tokyo was No. 16. ② A lot of people were using cars in Copenhagen, too, but around 1980, the city started making better roads and rules for bicycles, and the number of bicycle users started increasing. Around 2017, the number of bicycle users in Copenhagen became almost the same as the number of car users. I was also surprised to see that the number of bicycle accidents in Copenhagen was "lower than in other large cities. I think it's because the roads (cyclists for safe/follow/ and/ are cyclists the traffic rules. In many Japanese road safety classes, children are taught that roads are dangerous and sometimes shown shocking scenes of traffic accidents, and they learn that they must follow traffic rules when they ride a bicycle. But in Denmark. children play games in their classes. They can have fun when they learn traffic rules. Now there is a movement in Japan that gives children road safety classes in this way. Bicycles are cheaper than cars and healthier. They're also friendlier to the environment. The United Nations expects that about 70% of the people in the world will live in big cities by 2050. Such a large number of people will cause some problems, and more traffic is one of them. Copenhagen is a very good role model for Sustainable cities and communities" which is one of the U.N.'s "Sustainable Development Goals. I think Copenhagen's ideas to increase the number of bicycle users are wonderful because people there don't have to stop doing anything. They choose bicycles because the city is designed in a way that using a bicycle is more convenient than using a car, bus. or train. However, after the number of bicycle users increased, more parking spaces are needed there. (3 To make a bicycle-friendly city, just making more bicycle lanes isn't enough. We must think about the future of our cities. Denmark has made a lot of great plans and has more exciting plans for the future. For example, it's going to build a "bicycle" "superhighway" between cities and other areas by around 2045. I definitely want to ride a bicycle on it some day! 〔注〕 be cared おびえて こわがって bicycle lane 自転車専用の車線. レーン cyclist ...... 自転車乗りの人、サイクリスト pass…………〜を追いこす。 通り過ぎる narrow ・・・・・・幅が狭い Copenhagen コペンハーゲン (Denmark 「デンマーク」の首都) magazine 雑誌 on foot... 徒歩で bicycle-friendly... 自転車にやさしい traffic light...信号 (traffic は 「交通 (量)」)

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

(C)に当てはまる単語を選び形を変えて入れる問題です。入る単語はlookで、回答はlooksでしたがなぜlookedがダメなのかが分かりません。理由を教えて欲しいです。

d times ir way in the early morning hours. Another concern has to do with the cost implications of delaying school start - an ever-present issue in the age of increasingly tight school budgets, and decreasing tax revenues. The move could lead to a range of initial up-front costs, with budget-watchers worried most ( 2 ) costs/associated with changing bus schedules and additional lighting for athletic fields because after-school activities would be pushed later in the day. However, our recently released research for the RAND Corporation ( B ) that delaying school start times to 8:30 a.m. could actually result in significant economic statewide benefits that would be realized within a matter of years. Over the span of about a decade, the United States could stand to make financial gains of around $83 billion if teenagers were able to get more sleep. In California alone the financial gains would be just over $10 billion. Within even two years, most states would break even in terms of the initial costs of the move versus the economic benefits. These gains are based on a macroeconomic model that ( C ) at two key effects of better-rested teens: improved academic performance and reduced motor vehicle crashes. In terms of academic performance, research published ( 3 ) the apt title

未解決 回答数: 1
TOEIC・英語 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

下線部(1)の文構造が分かりません。特に2行目の文構造が分かりません。強調のdoであることは分かりますが、その後のthat以降が関係詞?かすらも分からないので、誰か教えて下さい!

次の英文は1991年に出版された本からのもので、 研究分野としての「人工知 能」 (Artificial Intelligence) について述べています。 下線部(1)~(3)を日本語に訳 しなさい。 What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Just about the only characterization of Al that would meet with universal acceptance is that it involves trying to make machines do tasks which are normally seen as requiring intelligence. There are countless refinements of this characterization: what sort of machines we want to consider; how we decide what tasks require intelligence and so on. One of the most important questions concerns the reasons why we want to make machines do such tasks. AI has always been split between people who want to make machines do tasks that require intelligence because they want more useful machines, and people who want to do it because they see it as a way of exploring how humans do such tasks. We will call the two approaches the engineering approach and the cognitive-science respectively. (2) (1) approach The techniques required for the two approaches are not always very different. For many of the tasks that engineering AI wants solutions to, the only systems we know about that can perform them are humans), so that, at least initially, the obvious way to design solutions is to try to mimic what we know about humans. For many of the tasks that cognitive-science Al wants solutions to, the evidence on how humans do them is too hard to interpret to enable us to construct computational models, so the only approach is to try to design solutions from scratch" and then see how well they fit what we know about humans. The main visible difference between the two approaches is in (3) their criteria for success; an engineer would be delighted to have create something that outperformed a person; a cognitive scientist would regard it as a failure. -1- M7 (492-61

未解決 回答数: 1
1/14