自然はどの単語から訳しているのですか教えてください 直訳も教えてくだい

COlIpIeA UI social, cultural and psychological factors inyolved in the construction of the public's desire to conserve.s bovonas gar won linu qu bol2ixs svai Iat antmu

問4① 彼らは少ない時間でより生産的になる、というのが仕事に対して言っていると特定できるのは何故でしょうか、、、？？ 本文で生産的になるのが仕事のことしか言っていないからでしょうか？？

第3回 実戦問題 73 Vou are going to have a debate about men taking parental leave. In order to prepare for the debate, your group is reading the article below. According t0 a recent survey, about 5.14% of new fathers in Japan Love taken parental leave. Over the years, the number of men who take 18u0 narental leave has grown, but it is still a big challenge for men to take it in male-oriented-Japanese society. So, here is my question: Do you think more Japanese men should take parental leave or not? Taking parental leave has one great benefit. If men take it for even a couple of weeks after the baby arrives, it is a great help to their wives. Most families are now nuclear families, so it is more difficult for couples with a new child to get support from their parents. Husbands can provide not only physical support but also mental support to their wives. Since new mothers face many unexpected situations every day, they can feel a lot of stress. Getting help is the key to reducing it. Another benefit is that parental leave is usually refreshing for men, allowing them to work more efficiently after they return to their jobs. On the other hand, there are reasons men should not take it. (First, during parental leave, they get no salary. This can put a lot of pressure on family finances. Second, many people are still against men taking it, which places psychological pressure on the men who do. What do you think about this issue? Ibelieve that when men take parental leave, it helps them understand how hard caring for a baby is. Knowing more about the hard work of their wives surely strengthens their relationship. Furthermore, when men eagerly raise their children, Tamily bonds become stronger. Nobody could argue that such things should be not be encouraged. 第3回 don

答えが無くて分からないので教えて欲しいです

SIMなし合 22:01 Cop 【1】次の英文を読んで, 設問 1~12に答えなさい。 なお, *印の語(句)には文末に注 がついています。 Modern examinations of working conditions in British and U.S. industry in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries concentrate mainly on the experiences, Complaints, and overall difficulties of working-class laborers. The first complaint that a majority of industrial workers had was that their workdays* were too long. The average (ア) of hours in a shift varied from industry to industry, from place to place, and from era to era. Workers in British and American textile mills* in the early to middle 1800s generally worked twelve to fifteen hours, six days a week, ( イ) only Sundays off. Their average workweek* was seventy-eight hours. In contrast were the hours of workers who labored in American steel mills in the late 1800s. The length of their shifts was determined by the fact that the blast furnaces* they tended almost always operated twenty-four hours a day. Thus, (oit became customary* for steel mills to have two twelve-hour shifts. However, many of the steel workers labored seven days a week. (a)That gave them a workweek of sighty-four hours. Moreover, sometimes they had to work extra hours on top of this demanding schedule. (オ )the minor differences in the length of workweeks from one industry to another, the average worker put in twelve-to fourteen-hour days at least six days a week, This harsh schedule remained more ( カ) less standard well into the twentieth century. It was not until 1920 that a fifty-hour workweek was introduced in the United States. Anda forty-hour week did not become the rule in most industries until 1938. Low wages was another common complaint of industrial workers. In 1851, the average wage earned by American industrial workers in general was seven to ten dollars per week. That same year New York's Daily Tribune* reported that a worker's family of five required just over ten dollars a week just for basics such as rent, food, and fuel. Most ordinary workers could not afford many simple comforts that middle-class workers enjoyed. (o This miserable situation lasted in America for decades and improved only slowly. As late as 1912, a study found that only 15

1〜10の語句に当てはまるものをa〜jの中で選んでください。 1. frequently 2. huge 3. put ~ at risk 4. culling 5. logical 6. trap 7. contrary to expectations 8. ... 続きを読む

この教科書のレベルはどのくらいですか教えください この教科書でどのくらいのレベルの大学まで対応できますか？

1 On 10 February 2009, at a height of about 800 kilometers above Siberia, an American satellite collided the first such height [háit] satellite [séetalait] collide(d) [kaláid(id)] with an old Russian satellite. It was collision [kaligan] collision in the history of space development. As a result, fragment(s) [fráegmant(s)) debris [dabri:] more than 1,000 fragments of debris were scattered into space. 2 The image above shows the vast amount of space debris in orbit around Earth. Approximately 22,000 vast [váest] orbit [5:rbat] approximately [aprá:ksamatli) objects larger than 10 centimeters across are floating around Earth. Of these, about 16,000 are from known 10 considering [kansidarig) artificial [a:rtafijal] currently [ks:rantli] operation [a:paréifon] Considering that there are only about 1,000 artificial satellites currently in operation, the amount of Sources. space debris is astonishing. This space debris is not only due to the collision of satellites. For example, when rockets reach space, they s 15 leave behind surplus engines and fuel tanks. These objects remain in orbit as space debris. In addition, surplus s5:rplas] there are tools that astronauts have dropped while tool(s) [t:l(z)) astronaut(s) [astrand:t(s) aluminum [ala:manom per|par] working outside. Even a one-centimeter aluminum ball. when orbiting at a speed of around 10 kilometers per 0 bullet [bálat] second, is far more powerful than a bullet from a gun. gun [gán]

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

至急です！ 穴埋めてください💦

. The group members discussed ( ) or not they should focus on biological rese a. what b. it c. either d. whether 2. Your report is a useful record of ( a )you observed in the laboratory. a. what b. it c. that d. whether 創めなそう必要 ) the plans meet the needs of the community. 3. This document describes ( a. it b. how いつ名し への Biし c. when d. what ) happened in the spacecraft was a tragedy. a. What b. How C. When d. Whether %しせつ ) his first computer was brought home. 5. My father remembers ( C a. what b. where c. when d. whether ト? 物ア ) works the hardest/has the best chance to succeed. S a. Whatever b. Whoever c. Whenever d. Whichever タるかンクイレ

③の a coming wave of 〜がなぜ来たるべきという訳になるかが分からないです。

S V 0 議共で 3a coming wave of technological progress 「来たるべき技術進歩の波」 ④ that は直後に動詞 will finally sweep があることから関係代名詞の主格(→Fo

この4問解答解説お願いします！

A2. The Johnsons ( ) in the same house for 25 years, so it's hard to believe they're going to move. (1)lived (2)have lived (3)had been living (4)had lived A7. The movie ( ) by the time you finish that huge bucket of popcorn. (1)ended (2)had ended (3)will have ended (4)has ended 15. There ( ) several family arguments before they made the final decision. (1)had been (2)have been (3)was (4)would be 室3.I could see from his face that he ( )a sad message.. (1)has received (2)will receive (3)had received (4)receives