学年

質問の種類

数学 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

確率の勉強をしている学生なのですが、この問題が分かりません。どなたか教えていただけませんか。

練習問題 1.8 (積率母関数) X を非負の確率変数とし, x(t) = Eetx は全てのt∈ に対して有限であると仮定する.さらに,全てのt∈ R に対し E [XetX] < ∞ であると仮定する.この練習問題の目的は, '(t) = E [Xetx] で あり、特に'(0)=EX であることを示すことである。 微分の定義, すなわち次式を思い出そう. 4'(t) = lim x(t) - (s) lim st t-s st EetxEesx t-s 「etx = lim E st t-s 上式の極限は,連続な変数sについて取っているが,t に収束する実数列{8}n=1を 選ぶことができ, 次を計算すればよい. 「etx e³n X lim E sn→t t-Sn これは、次の確率変数の列 etx -enx Yn = t-Sn の期待値の極限を取っていることになる.もしこの極限が, t に収束する列{Sn}=1 の選び方によらず同じ値になるならば、この極限も limotE [ex と同じで,そ れは '(t) である. .tx sx ← -e t-s 解析学の平均値の定理の主張は,もしf(t) が微分可能な関数ならば、任意の実数 s ともに対し,stの間の値の実数0で次を満たすものが存在するというものである. f(t)-f(s) =f' (0) (t-s). もしweΩを固定し,f(t) = etx(w) を定義すると,この式は, etX(w)_esx(w)=(t-s) X (w)e (w)x(w) (1.9.1) となる.ただし,(ω) はωに依存する実数 (すなわち,tとsの間の値を取る確率変 数)である. (i) 優収束定理 (14.9) (191) 式を使って,次を示せ. lim EY = Elim Yn=E [XetX] . (1.9.2) n→∞ [n→∞ このことから,求める式 4'(t) [XetX ] が導かれる. (ii) 確率変数 X は正の値も負の値も取り得、全てのt∈Rに対し Eetx < かつ E [|X|etX] < ∞ であると仮定する。 再度 '(t) = E [XetX] を示せ(ヒント: (1.3.1) 式の記号を使って X = X + - X- とせよ . )

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

投げやりです。すいません。英語皆無なので代行してください。

【必答問題 5 日常使う物のデザインをする際には標準化 (standardization) という方法がある。 という内容に続く次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点44) If we examine the history of advances in all technological fields, we see that some improvements come naturally through the technology itself, while others come through standardization. The early history of the automobile is a good example. The first cars were very difficult to operate. They required strength and skill beyond the abilities of many. Some problems were solved through automation. Other aspects of cars and driving were standardized through the long process of international standards committees: . On which side of the road to drive (constant within countries) country, but variable across On which side f the car the driver sits (depends upon which side of the road the car is driven) -The (2) of essential components: steering wheel, brake, clutch, and accelerator (the same, whether on the left- or right-hand side of the car) Standardization is one type of cultural constraint. With standardization, once you have learned to drive one car, you feel confident that you can drive any car, anyplace in the world. Standardization provides a major breakthrough in usability. I have enough friends on national and international standards committees to realize that the process f determining an internationally accepted standard is laborious. Even when all members agree on the merits of standardization, the task of selecting standards becomes a long, political issue. A small company can standardize its products without too much difficulty, but it is much more difficult for an industrial, national, or international body to agree to standards. There even exists a standardized procedure for establishing national and international standards. organizations works on standards. First, a set of national and international Then when a new standard is proposed, it must work its way through each organization's approval process. Standards are usually the result of a *compromise among the various competing positions, which can often be an inferior compromise. Sometimes the answer is to agree on (4 ). Look at the existence I both metric and *English units; of left-hand- and 18 right-hand-drive automobiles. There are several international standards for the *voltages and *frequencies of electricity, and several different kinds of electrical plugs and sockets- which cannot interchanged. With all these difficulties and with the continual advances in technology, are standards really necessary? Yes, they are. Take the everyday, clock. It's standardized. Consider how much trouble you would have telling time with a backward clock, where the hands revolved "counterclockwise." A few such clocks exist, primarily as humorous conversation pieces. When a clock truly violates standards, such as (the one in Figure 1, it is difficult to determine what time is being displayed. Why? The logic behind the time display is identical to that of conventional clocks: there are only two differences - the hands move in the opposite direction (counterclockwise) and the location of "12," usually at the top, has been moved. This clock is just as logical as the standard one. It. bothers us because we have standardized on a different scheme, on the very definition of the term clockwise. Without such standardization, clock reading would be more difficult: you'd always have to figure out the "mapping. E) compromise *metric メートル法の *English units イギリスの計量法(ヤードボンド法) *frequencies of electricity 電気の周波数 voltages E *mapping 対応づけ (2つのものの間の関係を意味する専門用語) 問1 下線部(1)の内容を、 同じ段落の自動車の例に基づいて30字以内の日本語で答えよ。た だし、句読点も字数に数える。 問2 本文中の空所 (2) に入る語として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ 選び 記号で答えよ。 7 color イ location ウ price I sight (239) 問3 第2パラグラフ (Standardization is one type of ...) について 次の Question に対す る Answer となるように、空所に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エのうちから一 つ選び、 記号で答えよ。 Question: What is "a major breakthrough in usability" provided by standardization? Answer Because of standardization, you ( device of the same kind all over the world. 7 can apply what you have learned to イ can make cannot produce I cannot use what you have learned when using 問7 下線部(5)が表す図 (Figure 1)として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選 び記号で答えよ。 11 12 1 12 ) any machine or 10 2 10% 9 3 1 5 6 問4 下線部(3)の示す内容を, 40字程度の日本語で答えよ。 ただし, 句読点も字数に数える。 ウ 11 6 1 問5 次の文を第3パラグラフ (Ihave enough friends...) に入れるとき,本文中の①~ のうちのどの位置に入れるのが最も適当か、 次のア~エのうちから一つ選び, 記号 で答えよ。 9 3 Each step is complex, for if there are three ways of doing something, then there are sure to be strong proponents of each of the three ways, plus people who will argue that it is too early to standardize. 70 問8 最終パラグラフ (With all these difficulties...) の内容をもとに, 次の Question に2 語程度の英語一文で答えよ。 Question: According to the writer, why is the standardization of the everyday clo necessary? イ 2 ウ H O 問6 本文中の空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選び 記号で答えよ。 7 a single standard 1 several different standards ウ the same standard I too few standards <<-20-> <-21->

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

付箋で貼った2文がどうしてそのような訳になるのかわかりません。

た次の英文を読み, 設問に答えなさい。 (学習院 法学部 2022年) Society is everything. Many of us go through life thinking we are self-made and self-sufficient. Some may credit (or blame) their families for success or failure in life, but rarely do we think about (1) the bigger forces (that determine our destinies - the country we happen to be born in, the social attitudes common at a particular moment in history, the institutions that govern our economy and politics, and the randomness of just plain luck. These wider factors determine the kind of society in which we live and are the most important determinants of our human experience. 2 Consider an example of a life in which society plays a very (X) role. In 2004 I spent time with a family in the Ecuadorian Amazon*. Antonia, my host, had twelve children, and her oldest daughter was about to give birth to her first grandchild. They lived on the edge of the rainforest with no road, electricity, clean water or sanitation*. There was a school, but a considerable distance away, (Y) the children's attendance was irregular However, Antonia was a community health worker and had access via radio* to a doctor in a nearby town who could provide advice to her and others. Apart from this service (arranged by a charity), she and her husband had to be completely self-reliant gathering food from the forest, educating their children on how to survive in their environment. On the rare occasions when they needed something they could not find or make themselves (like a cooking pot), they searched for bits of gold in the Amazon, which they could exchange for goods in a market at the end of a long journey by boat. 3 This may seem like a very extreme and distant example, but it serves to remind us how accustomed we are to the things that living collectively gives us infrastructure, education and health care, laws that enable markets in which we can earn incomes and access goods and services. Antonia and her daughter promised to name the baby (they were Minouche, (2) which was a great honour. I often wonder what kind of life that other Minouche will be having as a result of being born in a very different society. V+ re expecting The way a society is structured has profound consequences for the lives of those living in it and the kinds of opportunity they face. It determines not just their material conditions but also their well-being, relationships and life The structure of society is determined by institutions such astical and legal systems, the economy, the way in which family and community life are organized. All societies choose to have some things left to individuals and others determined collectively. The rules governing how ? those collective institutions operate form what might be called the social contract, which 1 believe is the most important determinant of the kinds of lives we lead. Because it is so important and because most people cannot easily leave their societies, the social contract requires (Z) of the majority and necessary changes ás circumstances change. VF vf ⑤We are living at a time when, in many societies. people feel disappointed by the social contract and (3) the life it offers them. This is despite the huge gains in material progress the world has seen over the last 50 years. Surveys Social contract people

解決済み 回答数: 1