ノートテキスト
ページ1:
Microeconomics
_go
Chp 1.
to
9/25
-
not
recorded lecture.
any
discussion I wane to
Study of
Econ?
5 foundations.
choice under condition of scarcity.
(ex. time, resource).
limitation.
↗
^
①Incentives:
ppl respond to
this predictable.
© Trade-offs : " everything you didn't do to do this
℗
④
Opportunity Cost: value of No. 2 option.
Marginal Thinking: rational economic thinker.
✓ nexe, additional, "one" more
(ex) {
evaluate every time
if
you were "pizza (0)
think
© Trade is good: ppl trade when they
you want 12 pieces of pizzas (X)
values the thing
more than the price.
Macro vs. Micro
whole
individual
Why is unemply why is "he"
rate low?
unemployed?
ページ2:
or ②Models Truling & gains from Trade. (9/30) norm Positive faut Sundart Normative + opinion, feeling, belief, "should" ex) P: unemplay rate = 3% N: the rate is too low' . Economic Model: pizzas Bicycles A pportunity cose (0) A is where bought (x) wings simplified, abstract, representation reality. (assumptions) → Ceteris Paribus (are other things const.?) → variables . •endogenous :: axes on the graph xagenous : axes not on the graph. • exag out Production Possibilities Frontiers (PPF) " " Curve (PPC) edge. 7 produce consume? possibilities capability Scarcity pizzas 100 70 50 A 4. F • (impossible "now") Efficient Points on the line : Finefficient point, D B 90 150 300 wings PPF -Cars →max potential output. unemployment human resource >> not used to "max" PPF curve stays »ineff. unemployed economy moves from eft. (does not move the curve) Specialization Trade • Absolute Advantage: A comunsy produce Beary • Comparative Advantange: Produce oppur-cost <B. ex) Pizzas Wings Gwen 60 120 1:2 Blake 24 72 1:3 possible CA in wings CA in pizzas AC: trade off give up. 30 pizzas Pizzas Law of increasing Opportunity Cost Econ. Growth Wings 50 100 150 200 250 300
ページ3:
ECN 001A 10/7 Test: 8Q (100pts) (80min) (free response) Chp 3. Supply and Demand market place (price system) P indogenous P. Qo (axes) Pr Po . Firms (company) -supplier of goods/services Consumers - demander/buyer of I → "perfectly competitive " : So much firms and consumers, P individual don't change big picture Demand: Price S Quantity Demanded (Qo) Law of Demand: P↑ Qo↓ inverse PV Qo↑ relation (price: a kind of incentive) Demand Chart. 20 P(31 15 lo 5 2 D 200 I↑ ✓ ↓ decrease change -Q. exogenous increase (good) right (bad) left Qp ①4 in income (exo anons) • Normal goods: Income↑, DT. increase Inferior goods: Income↑, Pt - clecrease . 8 . Lseg. 2 Complements in : we p of related goods buy 2 together (ex hotdog & bun) A on B. (ex. coke/papsi) Substitutes: "" Comp : PAT Dev. Subs PA↑ DBT. P Qo Em St. Qo 20 。 0 17.5 15 2 。 0 12.5 3 10 4 2 7.5 5 2 5 6 3 2.5 7 3 。 8 4 QT ②Change in Taste/Prefs in # Buyers. Price Expectations
ページ4:
Supply • P S Qs • Law of Supply: PT, Qs P S P↓, Qs ↑ decrease Cleft) T Chad) increase (right) (good) © Change ②Change M în cost #suppliers ③ Change in technology Q5 (14) of inputs ④Price Expectations
ページ5:
ECN 001A 10/7 P P P* <P Normal Good, ↑ Income, input cost .5 DT S↓ P Q Q Qo QS Q0 equilibrium point (p* .Q*). → Qo=Qs P Qs>Q0. (excess supply/surplus) Qo>Qs (excess demand/shortage) ê S P₁ Q Q1 normal good, income ↑ P↑↑ P P₁ Do p* Q 5 S₁ So Q 21 input cost ↑ (bad, left) P↑ Q↓ note: new eq. point = most recent SD point Pi p* M So PTQT P Pl So prad p* Conclusion: P↑ Q?
ページ6:
Chp.4 Elasticity: Responsiveness of buyers/sellers to
prize/income change
• Income Elasticity of Demand = εI
or
% >Q
=
% income
• necessities: 0 < x <\
°
Prize
elaticity of Demand
=
PED = E₁ = ED
can be
%000
=
%P
5
0
normal goods
• by "Law of Demand"
elastic
inferior goods
81 <0
luxuries: >1
|eo| > | :
20 < = inelastic
|8o| = | :
unit elastic
。 5 determinants (factors) of ED.
。 Cross- Price Elasticity of Demand = {₁₂ =
relations
Substitutes &> 0
existence of substitutes (0)
→ elastic
coke/pepsi
Complements o
(X)
no
relation
E₁ = 0
→ inelastic
disney park.
Share of
your budget devoted to the good.
%40
A
% SP
of related good
sale x2 → Qon
→> inelastic
$car +2
→ Qo↓
elastic
Elasticity
%0Q5
O Prive Elasticity of Supply = Es = % *P
example
Es
Necessities
vs. Luxuries
perfectly inelastic
Es=o
Oceanfront Land
inelastic
elastic
(relatively).
④Def. of Market:
Broadly vs. Narrowly
inelastic
elastic
O< Es < |
Cell Phone Taver
Es >
Hot dog Vendor
eg.
Drinks
Soft Drink
inelastic
elastic
determinants: The flexibility of Producers.
Time
long: elastic
short inelastic
P
12
before
after
before
after
->
G
b
after
QD
20
30
+50%
= -|
80 = -50%
- 33%
+100%
before Ep =
=-0.33
I different!
the (%) is based on
Price
because
dif. bose values.
Let's make the base value Same in 2 cases
Pbase = Pary =
Pretre + Pafter
2
Qo
betre +
=
owy
2.
midpoint method
Pz
SQ
P₁
E₁ =
Do (base)
base
if
we
use midpoint method
+1%25
then ED (B-> A) = -6/9
ED(ADO)
now |E| < |-
-10/25
+619
=
= -0.6
-0.6
inelastic
(1)
Pbasa
0
☺
Spare production capacity
Storage
Time and the Adjustment Process
short
time
→ long
elasticity inelastic
elastic
short
long
inelastic
S₁
Q Q Q
elastic
%ods
95%01
Quantity
ページ7:
Q: How do Ep and Es relate to each other? Price (per barrel) SER SLR E2 $90 Es $80 $50 Q1 Q2 Q3 D₁ D₂ Quantity produced (barrels) oil supply is not easy to increase in the short mn.
ページ8:
Pa ECN 001A 10/23 " Next Tuesday exam 2 producer Chp 5. welfare analysis consumer pads 个 P totul surplus = s+ps S CS -p* CS PS Q* -Q PS Qt PD S (elastic) CS↓ PSV Tax Revenue Tax Revenue CSL PS↓ (inelas.) >Q. PA P₁ = p*/ Qt D S (inelastic) PSV. Per-Duet -PS- D =Q+ Ps Po =PATR TR NO: DATE: PL Dead Weight Lost (DWL) D CS-CS+TR+DWL DWL CSV 5
ページ9:
Chapter 6. pt Pc . . Prize Price Controls that can be charged Ceilings : government set max.price for good/service Price Floors min. QD > Qs: shortage (excess of demand). ex. rent control 2. → price↓ some ppl can't rent. a R S PF p Qp Q ' D → Q Qs > QD = surplus persistent surplus. Per-Duet
ページ10:
externalities: costs Chapter Externalities & Public Goods P p PE 5 •: where we are. • should be Social Demand private demand. QE distortion. Property Rights buyers. Q include third party (and buyers). ?? Coase theorem : no barrier 15. interest in nego., party will property rights specifrent Private & Public Goods • limited to "paying" customers • Excludable. Goods: Rival no purchase, no use. Goods: can't be enjoyed by. >1 person. • usage by one person & availability for others. Chapter 8 Business Costs and Production. 。 Labor 。 Capital ° other factors of production. Maximize Profits: T = TR-TC. or benefits of a market activity affecting a third party. o-subsidy S SD PD Q* QE. ← distortion club good! Public goods excludable private goods Common-relohne →rival goods. Both excludable and rival → Private Goods eg. shoes non '' non Public Goods. eg. and non Club Goods eg. Netflix. non s and 4 National Def. Common Resource Goods. eg. public restrooms. fish in ocean tragedy of the commons. + eg. overfishing in international waters TR= PXQ Q? #workers total output MP 。 Production Function - profit total revenue total cost. T 52 5 MP= Marginal Product. 2 15 10 Diminishing MP 3 30 15 4 -42 12 (Flower Pot Law) 5 52 10 short run 6 60 8 ✓ d 7 65 5 fixed factories machines vary workers 8 67 2 9 63 -4 10 55 -8
ページ11:
-5. 11/4 ECN 001A output # I 15 40 20. I E Short Run vs. J Long-Run at least Perial of production which one of inputs fixed long : everything variable. variable costs (UC) int. Fixed costs (FL) →x change with →TC = FC + VC # we produce. #worker. Total Cost (TC) ÷Q ✓ dif. average ATC = T ← ATC = AFC + AVC AVC = V AFC = FL. 5 MP io #worker MP<0 MPJ TIL Marginal Cost MC = ATC AQ Sunk Cost: costs incurred in the past. commited to spend but can't spend. should be ignored when making decisions. eg.) your sink, and you bought $100. ·Stay at home healthy decisions: both go to concert. happy uberly loses $100. Q VC FC TC AVC AFC ATC MC 0 720 720 | 7 720 727 1 720 -727 7 2 20 720 740 10 360 370 13 3 45 120 765 15 240 255 25 4 88 720. 808 22 180 202 43
ページ12:
cost =FL TC. MC. ATC ATCmin AVC +FC VC +FL =FL Q FC explain: MC= AVC SQ = ATC SQ AUC min = the cost AFC Q increment of TC or VC MC > ATC, then "AULT or ATCT , if MC > AVC on vice versa.
ページ13:
ECN OOLA 116 etc. cheese cake factory ATC. Long-Run ATC curve groceries Store To yrs. ago. ATC↓ ATC. Economies of Scale Dis economies of Scale Cbecoming bigger less effcient ). ( scale ↑, QT). Economies of "Scale" → Constant Returns to Scale " 。 Economies of Scope " 5 60 2 16. 10. 18 80 #>0 *
ページ14:
- Chp 9 Firms in a Competitive Market Perfect/Pure Competition charecteristic lots of sellers and buyers. -nearly identical good (eg. agricul. prod) firms: price takers. → taking the price from the market place. - entry /exit ↑ free (easy) - to the market place of suppliers. instantaneously firm's goal: maximize profit. note: not real, just a ref. frame. p* = 10 Q TR TC 兀 MR MC 0 0 25 -25 - T 10 34 -24 10 9 2 20 41 -21 10 7 3 30 46 -16 10 5 4 40 49 -9 10 3 5 50 51 -1 10 2 6 60 54 6 10 3 2 no 60 10 10 6 8 80 70 10 10 10 9 90 95 -5 10 25 10 100 10. 145 -45 50 Choose where MC=MR → Max π MC MR MC > MR MC=MR stop! MC CMR X @ MC=MR=P is Qstop
ページ15:
P market one particular firm √ SR MC * SUR ATL D=MR D ATC Q QF QF TL = TR-TL ↓ ATC= TC Q P.Q TL= ATL.Q Short -run PSATL ATC >P> AVC 元 produceπ= TR-TFC-TUC → operate @ a loss PCAVC → shut-down Short xpwd: π= -TFC run. Long-Run P>ATU π P<ATC Losses, shut down, go out of business Long Run Equilibrium SRS MC ATL LRS P q firms mkt. What happens if D 1? 吕 SRS. P₁ Q 8 Q2 -------- other firms enter→ ST P↓ back to Pl MC SRS2. TU ATC c LRS a. Q3 21%2


Comment
No comments yet